Poor little Alfie Evans, the 23-month-old boy in the UK who defied his doctors AND his government by doing what NONE OF THEM thought was possible... staying alive despite the UK removing his respirator and when he started breathing on his own, they decided to starve and dehydrate him to death against his parents' and the Vatican's wishes. The Pope and Vatican sent a plane that stood by to bring Alfie to a special hospital in Italy, and have even granted him Italian citizenship, but England refused to release Alfie until he was dead.

This illustrates the danger of socialized medicine, but is even one step further since releasing Alfie meant that he would no longer cost the UK any more money, yet still the UK seems determined to kill him (at additional cost) as an example to others who would fight to live when the government determines that they are a "burden" and a threat to their profits that they skim from socialized medicine.


Baby Charlie Gard Story And The Culture Of Death
May 27, 2018 Read More Articles by Shirley Edwards

(These are my views as a woman living in England, on how the culture and spirit of my country has changed over 50 years.   Why the country does not feel protected or strong any more, how it has lost, and is losing it values and decency, and how we are daily losing our free speech.)

Part 2, Of Royal Birth Descended


It has always been fairly easy in some sense to view the laws of ‘cause and effect’ in action.   In relation to the human body, if it is subjected to a toxic substance, either physically or spiritually, it is more than evident that it will also result in disease, unrest, and eventually death.

However, all of us are born to posses ‘defects’, in some shape or form; it is part of the human condition, and we can also be subject to the many toxins of our environment. Overcoming them and doing the right thing appears to be a calling that some people will make, whilst others will not.

In terms of people born with a severe physical disability, one of the most insightful and inspirational people I have come across is a well known Christian international speaker.  (views may not be the same as the writers)

Born with no arms and no legs, he was once tempted to take his own life when he was a child.  He now travels the world encouraging and inspiring others to overcome their own personal disabilities; in every way.  He gives a message of hope.  After the initial shock of witnessing this man, in his very vulnerable state, you realize his spirit has become much more the person he is, than the obvious fact of his disabilities.    He is an over-comer and an encourager.  He is free.    After a short time of listening to him, his message is much more important. You can listen to him here.

It is my opinion that if there is a passage from the bible which sums him up, and epitomises who he is, it could possibly be from John 9:2, which surmises that some defects are for the purpose of Gods glory being revealed through them. Who are we to judge?

However, not all people see the potential that our very defected lives can offer. Could it be that there are some people who view others as an undesirable, a mere resource or a burden in society?   Is there a race of people who see themselves as superior?

Eugenics, ‘the selection of desired human characteristics in order to improve future generations’ has both positive and negative reviews, and whilst we mainly attribute negative eugenics to the atrocities/experiments carried out in Nazi Germany, there is a history before the holocaust, which stems from England and also the United States, from which, it is reported, Hitler, and Mengele also drew their inspiration from.

Briefly, British born, Francis Galton, related to Charles Darwin, and inspired by Darwin’s book, ‘Origin of Species’ believed breeding humans with superior mental traits was essential to society.   He coined the phrase ‘eugenics’ and became knighted in 1909 to become ‘Sir’ Francis Galton for his research and scientific contributions, and it is believed he is responsible for launching the eugenics movement in the UK and also the USA. [Link]

British Labour MP Archibald Church, possibly  inspired by selective breeding, had proposed the compulsory sterilisation, like Germany, of certain ‘mental patients’ in Parliament in 1931, and although not passed, many sterilisations were forcibly carried out in England.

However, previously in 1907, men, women and children in America thought to be insane, or idiotic, epileptic or even promiscuous were forcibly sterilised by authorities who saw them as unfit to reproduce.

Other countries in the 20’s and 30’s had also passed similar laws, including the Scandinavian countries of Sweden, Denmark, Norway and Finland.  Such was the trend in eugenics.

Forced sterilization ended in America in 1974

In researching the history of eugenics you will find a history of sterilisation of undesirable people that our countries would rather forget or overlook.

In Britain, there have been recent cases of forced sterilisation (https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/mother-of-six-who-has-learning-difficulties-can-be-put-through-forced-sterilisation-rules-judge-10023496.html) which has bought up the debate on whether it is impinging on a woman’s human rights to be forcibly sterilized whether she has the mental capacity to understand the consequences of her actions or not? [Link]

It also seems somehow ironic that Francis Galton, who was born in Birmingham, England and studied for two years at Birmingham General Hospital, is connected to Birmingham Children’s Hospital, who were accused of removing 1500 hearts from patients without permission from relatives just twenty years ago.

Tomorrow’s Children

It appears that whilst we are being encouraged to believe that only positive eugenics are taking place today, by way of research to improve genetic conditions or illnesses, that there is a spirit of superiority which still exists which believes that some human beings are there to be tested upon, saved or discarded in an experimental fashion for another more underlying motive.

Further, is euthanasia, disguised as a type of dignity in dying, abortion, promiscuity, now being promoted in order to depopulate society in order for those who consider themselves the fitter more elite person to survive?     No longer are people forcibly euthanized or sterilised, mankind does this to itself under the guise of ‘freedom to choose’ whilst it is really under the spirit of what we call negative eugenics, a culture of death and under the same spirit which we attribute to the evil of Hitler’s death camps!

Serious thought should be given to the question “are we now living in one big death camp, giving permission, and thanking our captors for killing and experimenting on us?” or “Are we free, kind and compassionate people?”

Has the positive and sincere quest for improving human life through genuine medical research and enquiry descended?

The outright denial of further medical help and care offered to the family of Alfie Evans, following on from Charlie Gard, and the arrest of Ashya King’s parents for removing their child from hospital, sadly gives us this impression. [Link], [Link]

Hiding behind a plethora of kind words the world was witnessing some very cruel actions.

Sadly, whilst supporters of Alfie Evans family were demonstrating and voicing their concerns, and were being condemned for bringing his plight to public light, celebrations were taking place for pro-choice advocates in London after the UK’s first PSPO order (Public Space Protection Order was passed which effectively bans pro-life advocates from being within 100 metres of a West London abortion clinic.  To break that law you can face a fine of up to £1000.  One can only imagine how PSPO orders will now be used against future pro-lifers or against any other demonstrations or objections raised on ethical issues.

It should be remembered that those who spoke out against Hitler’s regime also faced threats or imprisonment and some were even executed.  PSPO orders may not execute people who break its law but most certainly it seems to be persecuting those who defend life. [Link]

Almost 77 years ago, the Bishop of Munster, Clemens August Graf von Galen spoke out against the Nazi euthanasia programme.   He is known as The Lion of Munster, and you can read about him here in an excellent article.

He is quoted as saying:

“If you establish and apply the principle that you can ‘kill’ unproductive human beings, then woe betide us all when we become old and frail!. . . . Do you, do I have the right to live only as long as we are productive?. . . .Nobody would be safe anymore. Who could trust his physician? It is inconceivable what depraved conduct, what suspicion could enter family life if this terrible doctrine is tolerated, adopted, carried out.”

I love Von Galen’s motto.   Nec Laudibus, Nec Timore – Unconcerned about praise, or fear.

People who are pro-life should be encouraged by Von Galen’s stand.   Nobility is a spirit, in the same vein as ‘Grace’.   The blood which runs through your veins could be from the most royal of all births.   Only God knows…..

Click here for Part 1

© 2018 Shirley Edwards – All Rights Reserved

E-Mail Shirley Edwards: eshirley02@gmail.com











Of Royal Birth, Descended, Part 1
May 21, 2018 Read More Articles by Shirley Edwards (https://newswithviews.com/author/shirley/)

[These are my views as a woman living in England, on how the culture and spirit of my country has changed over 50 years.   Why the country does not feel protected or strong any more, how it has lost, and is losing it values and decency, and how we are daily losing our free speech.]

Prince William and Katherine Middleton announced the name of their third child quite recently. It is Louis Arthur Charles, and he will be known as His Royal Highness, Prince Louis of Cambridge.

I noted that the actual birth of Prince Louis had been somewhat low-key, in comparison to previous royal births.    It was a whole week before I knew he had been born.   I believe the reason for this was that public world attention was being given to the plight of two year old Alfie Evans, who died under controversial circumstances in Alder Hey Hospital, Liverpool very recently.

The story of Alfie Evans can be viewed here.

Public celebrations for the royal birth also seemed very minimal, and whilst we have delighted in viewing the beautiful photographs of the royal baby meeting his siblings, you could not help or fail to compare the images of privilege and happiness, against the many images of little Alfie, who at the same time, in his own vulnerability, appeared to many people to be in the hands of another authority who did not have his, or his parents, best interests at heart.

The controversy around a court decision to switch of vital life support and refuse his parents permission to seek further alternative help which was being offered to them raised a great amount of frustration for many British citizens who questioned the reason for this.  What impact would that decision have on all vulnerable patients, who could possibly have a chance of life?

Some people were very vocal about the treatment of Alfie Evans and his parents, and also against Alder Hey Hospital.  There were accusations directed at the demonstrators being insulting to staff and visitors outside of the hospital.  Staff staff spoke of genuine fear!

But not everyone was critical about the decisions being made about Alder Hey Hospital and Alfie Evans.

The Archbishop of Liverpool, Malcolm McMahon, was very ‘supportive’ of the decisions made by Alder Hey Hospital, but emphasized they were praying for Alfie’s parents. [Link]

The Prime Minister, Theresa May, showed sympathy towards the case but respected the ‘difficult’ decisions made by clinicians, and it is reported believes that clinicians should decide on a child’s life, and not parents. [Link]

Unfortunately, it appears The Church of England, which belongs to The State of England, and answers to the government [which is why the Pilgrims came to America and established Freedom of Religion in the Bill of Rights] have said very little.  Her Majesty the Queen is the supreme governor of The Church of England.

Therefore, some people have stayed silently watching. Sympathetic, but silent.

Merseyside Police, who are the police force for the Liverpool area had also issued a statement in relation to criticism against Alder Hey Hospital.

Chief Inspector Chris Gibson said:

“Merseyside Police has been made aware of a number of social media posts which have been made with reference to Alder Hey Hospital and the ongoing situation involving Alfie Evans.

“I would like to make people aware that these posts are being monitored and remind social media users that any offences including malicious communications and threatening behaviour will be investigated and where necessary will be acted upon.”

Somewhere in that silence, where some people have the authority to speak up and make their voices known, and some people are being silenced; and amidst the celebration of new life and a sentence of death for a baby, hangs the truth, staring back at you.

What exactly is going on when parents and children are held in hospitals against their will, and all offers of alternative medical help are rejected?    That is the question?

What’s it All About?

The divide between people who used the words of compassion and dignity to excuse the decision made upon Alfie’s life, against those who saw the spirit of arrogance and dictatorship staring right back at them and laying down its law, was tangible. It could not have been more evident.    The aftermath of that decision is still hanging in the air.   It has left a stale taste and many un-answered questions for those who rely on a National Health Service, and also for some of those who work in the National Health Service.

An establishment which once preserved and fought for human life at all costs, seems to have become infiltrated with a culture of death and decision making which goes against reason.   Whilst the public greatly appreciate our medical services, there are also decisions being made which the public and many members of the medical profession are also at odds against.   They support the Hippocratic tradition.

Alder Hay Hospital in particular, has already received many bad reviews and has a very dark history which involved organ retention and organ harvesting from children’s bodies without permission from parents.  During the period from 1988 – 1995 more than 2,000 pots containing body parts from 850 infants were uncovered.

In 1999, the public had been unaware that Alder Hey and other hospitals were retaining patient’s organs without their consent.

The Alder Hey report (known as Redfern Report) was published in 2001.

Dutch pathologist Dick van Velzen had ordered the illegal stripping of every organ during a post mortem from every child during his time at the hospital.

The report also revealed that Birmingham Children’s Hospital and Alder Hey Hospital gave thymus glands removed from live children during heart surgery to a pharmaceutical company for research in return for donations.

You can read the report here.

This is the reason why people should not stay silent or be silenced on such important ethical issues in healthcare. [Link]

When Alfie’s life support was removed on the 23rd April, at the final instruction of the High Court, and he breathed on his own, showing signs of recognition and normality, not only did a population cheer for this little human life, but thousands of medical staff did too.

Many staff who wanted to sustain Alfie’s life and give him every conceivable chance was also being over-ruled by senior medical staff and a court system, who it is reported, had refused to consider any appeal by the parents.

It appears they also refused to listen to citizens who pay for the National Health Service, and they also refused to listen to an appeal from Pope Francis in Rome who had granted the child Italian citizenship to be treated in Italy, with absolutely no cost to Britain.   On the 23rd April, the day Alder Hay Hospital switched off his life support machine, a military air ambulance fully equipped to take Alfie to Bambino Gesu Hospital was already waiting.

The anguish, knowing about that offer of hope for some chance of life, which must have been experienced by his parents, was felt by thousands.

Alfie died on the 28th April.

Today, Monday 14th May it is his funeral.

We honor his short life.   Thank you Alfie for showing us your trust and your vulnerability in this harsh world and from your silent and peaceful world at least alerting us once more to our responsibility in protecting and valuing human life.

“If you want peace, work for justice. If you want justice, defend life. If you want life, embrace the truth the truth revealed by God.”

To be continued……..

© 2018 Shirley Edwards – All Rights Reserved

E-Mail Shirley Edwards: eshirley02@gmail.com

1- Prince William and Kate Middleton announce the royal baby’s name

2- Alfie Evans executed by lethal injection organ harvesting [which is one reason why the UK wouldn't release Alfie to the Pope and Vatican]

3- Doctors and parents

4- Open letter UK bishops handling of Alfie Evans case was an abject failure

5- Alder Hey organs scandal

ANALYSIS: Alfie Evans was executed by lethal injection; Alder Hey hospital steeped in horrifying history of organ harvesting from human babies

The entire Alfie incident is completely inexcusable -they will meet their maker one day and woe unto them - might little Alfie rest in peace!

This is going on https://www.aol.com/2012/09/27/organ-donor-network-used-atrocious-practices-former-worker-cl/

Those they declared 'brain dead' are often 'harvested' without anesthesia. There are numerous examples of this sort of thing http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1230092/Rom-Houben-Patient-trapped-23-year-coma-conscious-along.html and 'locked in' syndrome(if they don't just outright label you a vegetable)  (and the cases you list below) - they will sometimes use paralytic but still no anesthesia and they see the 'brain dead' reacting (pulse, BP etc but still play stupid as if they are 'brain dead' and cannot possibly feel)

British Citizens Threatened With Arrest For Exposing Baby Alfie’s Murder
April 30, 2018 Sean Adl-Tabatabai News, UK 2
British citizens threatened with arrest if they speak out against baby Alfie's murder

British police have warned citizens to “be careful about what they say on social media” regarding euthanized baby Alfie Evans, or face arrest.

In an Orwellian statement posted to social media, Police warned users against accusing doctors of murdering baby Alfie.

We’ve issued a statement this evening to make people aware that social media posts which are being posted in relation to Alder Hey and the Alfie Evans situation are being monitored and may be acted upon,” Merseyside Police tweeted.

    We've issued a statement this evening to make people aware that social media posts which are being posted in relation to Alder Hey and the Alfie Evans situation are being monitored and may be acted upon. Read the full statement here: https://t.co/epopt5bhmY
    — Merseyside Police (@MerseyPolice) April 25, 2018

Dailywire.com reports: The link goes to their Facebook page. Here’s the full statement from Merseyside Chief Inspector Chris Gibson:

Merseyside Police has been made aware of a number of social media posts which have been made with reference to Alder Hey Hospital and the ongoing situation involving Alfie Evans.

I would like to make people aware that these posts are being monitored and remind social media users that any offences including malicious communications and threatening behaviour will be investigated and where necessary will be acted upon.

What is creepy about the statement is that the police do not define “malicious communications” or “threatening behavior.” Rather than just give something concrete like “calls for violence will not be tolerated,” they issue a blanket statement where anything from calling the bureaucrats that want Alfie Evans to die a bunch of fascists to calling for a jihad against the hospital could be seen as “malicious communications.”

This failure to differentiate between those two dichotomies (speech and threats) stood at the heart of the recent controversy surrounding Scotland’s Youtube satirist Count Dankula, who was recently convicted of a “hate crime” for training his girlfriend’s adorable little pug to give Nazi salutes.

Fortunately, Count Dankula avoided jail time and was only fined £800 by a U.K. court for being “grossly offensive,” but that case set a dangerous precedent for regulating speech. The Merseyside Police warning the public that they are “monitoring” their free speech regarding a little boy being starved to death by the government is truly horrifying.

But good on the U.K. police for confiscating scissors, pliers, and screwdrivers from a private citizen during a so-called “weapons sweep.” Those electricians on their way to fix somebody’s bathroom lighting fixture sure do look suspicious in the pale moonlight.

Way to go, fascists. (This post is being monitored).

    These items were found during a #weaponSweep near #MackworthHouse #AugustasSt during #OpSceptre . Safely disposed and taken off the streets pic.twitter.com/53HdeqMKu1
    — Regents Park Police (@MPSRegentsPark) March 16, 2018

Baby Alfie’s Case Proves Kidnapping & Child Abuse Are Allowed When Government Calls it ‘Health Care’
If parents deprived their children of food and water until they died, they would be charged with child abuse. But when the state does it, it is called health care...

Baby Alfie, the Latest Victim of Omnipotent Government
Ron Paul — April 30, 2018

Educating people in the benefits of free markets, individual liberty, and a foreign policy of peace and free trade is key to protecting future Alfie Evanses, and other victims of the welfare-warfare state, as well as to restoring respect for the moral principles of liberty among a critical mass of the people.

Twenty-three-month-old Alfie Evans passed away in a British hospital on Saturday. While the official cause of death was a degenerative brain disease, Alfie may have been murdered by the British health system and the British high court. Doctors at the hospital treating Alfie decided to remove his life support, against the wishes of Alfie’s parents. The high court not only upheld the doctors’ authority to override the parents’ wishes, it refused to allow the parents to take Alfie abroad for treatment.

In upholding the government’s authority to substitute its judgment for that of Alfie’s parents, the high court is following in the footsteps of authoritarians throughout history.

Ever since Plato, supporters of big government have sought to put government in charge of raising children.

The authoritarianism of a system where “experts” can override parents is underscored by a police warning that they were “monitoring” social media posts regarding Alfie.

Alfie’s case is not just an example of the dangers of allowing government to usurp parental authority or the failures of socialized medicine.

It shows the logical result of the widespread acceptance of the idea that rights are mere privileges bestowed by government.

It follows from this idea that rights can be taken away whenever demanded by government officials or the popular will.

Of course, most western politicians deny they believe rights come from government.

They instead claim that government must place “reasonable” limits on rights to advance important policy goals, such as limiting the right to free speech to protect certain groups from hate speech, or limiting property rights to promote economic equality.

But a right, by its very nature, cannot be limited or abolished and still be a right.

This disdain for a true understanding of rights is found among both liberals and conservatives.

Both support a welfare-warfare state-funded program via the theft of income taxes and the indirect theft of inflation. Both support jailing people for nonviolent actions like drinking raw milk. Many politicians, regardless of ideology, support restrictions on parental rights such as mandatory vaccination laws.

While claiming to support the right to life, most modern liberals not only support legalized abortion, but they want to force pro-lifers to fund abortion providers.

Both the right-wing neocons and left-wing humanitarian interventionists dismiss the innocents killed in US military actions as inconsequential “collateral damage.”

America’s Founding Fathers rejected the idea that rights come from government. They instead embraced the view that rights are either granted by the creator or are a basic attribute of humanity.

Since rights do not come from government, government has no more legitimate authority to violate our rights than does a private individual.

Thus, if an individual cannot use force to make you help others, neither can the government.

If an individual cannot use force to stop you from gambling online or telling un-PC jokes, neither can the government.

If an individual cannot use force to stop parents from seeking medical treatment for their child, neither can the government.

Widespread acceptance of natural rights and the principle of nonaggression that flows from natural rights is key to obtaining and maintaining a free society. Thus, educating people in the benefits of free markets, individual liberty, and a foreign policy of peace and free trade is key to protecting future Alfie Evanses, and other victims of the welfare-warfare state, as well as to restoring respect for the moral principles of liberty among a critical mass of the people.

Article posted with permission from Ron Paul

Parents of Alfie Evans devastated as judge rules one-year-old's life support can be switched off because it's 'no longer in toddler's interests' [meaning that it was not in socialized medicine's interests]
Feb 20, 2018 - Heartbroken dad Tom Evans, 21, said the High Court judge had 'sentenced his son to death' as the family broke down in the public gallery.

Police Threaten Arrest If Citizens Speak Out Against the State-Sanctioned Death of Baby Alfie Evans
As the world rallies around a baby who is being held captive and denied medical care by the UK government, police are threatening his online supporters...

Armed Father Stops Doctors From Euthanizing ‘Brain Dead’ Son

 April 30, 2018 Sean Adl-Tabatabai News, US 0
Brain dead son gets to spend xmas with gun-carrying father who refused to let doctors euthanize his son

An armed dad from Texas successfully managed to stop doctors from euthanizing his ‘brain dead’ son moments before they were about to turn off his life support machine.

George Pickering III. George Jr. has made a full recovery after being a coma, all thanks to his brave father.

Rt.com reports: Upon hearing that doctors had given up hope, a drunk and armed George Sr. marched towards the Tomball Regional Medical Center in Houston, Texas, determined to make sure his son was given more time to make a recovery, even if it meant he would spend time in jail.

George Sr. barricaded himself inside with his 27-year-old son as he managed to hold off police, before something amazing happened.

Towards the end of the standoff, which was about three hours long, he felt his son squeeze his hand,” the family’s lawyer Phoebe Smith told RT.

“At this time, the SWAT team had already opened the door to the critical care room and he had surrendered to the police, but he surrendered knowing his son had squeezed his hand,” she added.

George Jr. had fallen into a coma after suffering a stroke in January. Doctors had declared him brain dead, while George II’s ex-wife and other son made the decision to turn off the life support machine.

However, there was one person who was not going to give up hope.

“The SWAT team had their own doctors and when they entered into the critical care room, they saw that my client’s son was not brain dead because he was making eye contact, was following their commands and they were completely amazed at this,” Smith added.

The Pickerings’ family lawyer also praised the courage and determination shown by George Sr.

“The amazing thing was that my client was right and that his son did survive. When you see him now, he is a picture of health. I don’t think he would have survived but for the fact that his father slowed the process down.”

After feeling signs of life from his son, George Sr. peacefully surrendered to the police. He was subsequently sentenced to 10 months’ prison time. He was released in December, just in time to spend Christmas with his son.

“There was a law broken, but it was broken for all the right reasons. I’m here now because of it. It was love, it was love,”George III told KPRC.

“The important thing is I’m alive and well, my father is home and we’re together again.”

Doctor: Starving Alfie Evans to Death “Is Not the Killing of A Child,” It’s Just “Redirecting Care” [i.e., deciding who is worthy of living and who is to die -- aka "Socialized Medicine Death Panels" -- even though he was an Italian citizen and releasing him to the Vatican would have cost the UK NOTHING, they insisted upon killing him!]
After a shocking and disgusting week — which saw the parents of Alfie Evans have to literally fight to save his life — now the justification of decisions by the British Court and medical system has begun...

Alfie Evans Dies 5 Days After Hospital Yanks His Life Support Without His Parents’ Permission
Rest in peace to an angel


Hey there,

It breaks my heart to announce to the world that little baby Alfie Evans died at 2:30 AM April 28th, in the UK. (That would have been 9:30 East coast time Friday night the 27th).

His mother, Kate James, just officially announced it 19 minutes ago on Alfie's official Army group to the hundreds of thousands, if not millions around the world.

You can read the story by clicking here.

We have covered the story how baby Alfie was taken off life support by Alder Hey hospital just days ago.

Despite experts, and even the Pope himself (with a jet ready to go) asking that he be brought to Italy where they could care for him and help wean him off of heavy sedatives, the hospital and courts refused.

Reports state that doctors said in sworn court statements that Alfie would only make it 3 to 5 minutes after being taken off life support, yet he proved them all wrong and lived several more days. Roughly 100 more hours. Some say he was essentially starved to death.

He was born healthy, but later developed infections and had myoclonic seizures (which I have as well as a result of vaccine injury [it's quite possible that the doctors caused the problem in the first place by vaccinating Alfie, then they killed him without releasing him to the Vatican to cover it up, in case an autopsy would be done!] ), and had spent many months heavily medicated, with the hospital winning custody of the child.

Rest in peace little angel. You will never be forgotten.

Our heart goes out to not only his mum Kate James, father Tom Evans, all his family and loved ones, but also the millions who were praying for him on every corner of the globe.

We'll be doing updates, and you can click on Facebook below to see our live video coverage.

Hug your loved ones a little closer today.

Erin Elizabeth :(

PS please see another 20 breaking stories below too.

Five days after a children’s hospital yanked his life support without his parent’s permission, little Alfie Evans has died. Alfie’s death comes after a massive legal battle between the hospital and his parents Tom and Kate.

In posts on Facebook, Alfie’s mother and father confirmed his passing.

“Our baby boy grew his wings tonight at 2:30 am. We are heart broken. Thank you everyone for all your support,” she wrote.

“My gladiator lay down his shield and gained his wings at 02:30 absolutely heartbroken,” the boy’s father Tom Evans wrote on Facebook.

The legal battle sparked anger nationwide in England but also internationally as people stood up for Alfie’s parents and strongly opposed courts and hospitals making life and death decisions for patients over their families objections.

There is concern that the hospital contributed to his death.

As LifeNews reported, after removing his life support without permission, officials at Alder Hey Children’s Hospital waited 28 hours before finally feeding the 23-month old boy, who was fighting a rare neurological condition. Alfie’s Father Tom Evans confirmed at the time that his son was finally being fed but he condemned hospital officials for waiting so long to finally get him the nutrition he needs.

“They only started feeding him at one ‘o’clock yesterday. It’s disgusting how he’s being treated,” Evans said. “Not even an animal would be treated like this. He’s proving them wrong. It’s time to give him some grace and dignity and let him go home or to Italy.”

The other day, Alfie’s parents changed course and decided to end their battle.

Alfie Evans’ father Tom Evans called for supporters of Alfie and his family to “stand down” so they can begin “building a bridge” with Alder Hey Children’s Hospital and its staff.  The statement from Alfie’s father was surprising given the animosity that had developed between the Evans family and the hospital. Hospital officials have spent months in court preventing Alfie’s family from taking him to a hospital in Italy or even taking him home. Hospital officials even went as far as misleading courts by saying that they never said Alfie would die quickly after his life support was removed — even though they initially said Alfie would die within minutes after yanking his life support over his parents’ objections.

But perhaps seeing that there was little opportunity left to fight for Alfie’s rights and their right to take him abroad or take him home or sensing a need to appease the hospital to bring him home, Tom Evans struck a conciliatory tone.

Click here to sign up for pro-life news alerts from LifeNews.com

Later, the family of Alfie Evans blasted a false news report saying his parents are supposedly preparing for his death.

Alfie’s parents had hoped to take the little boy to the hospital in order to potentially get experiemental treatment that could help his rare degenerative neurological condition but courts repeatedly denied that. Justice Hayden ruled that Alfie’s family would not be able to fly him to Italy for treatment and appeared to say that this was the final decision related to his case. He said flying Alfie to Italy could harm his health because, as court testimony indicated, the flight could trigger possible “continuous seizures due to stimulations” of the flight. But Alfie’s parents are concerned Alfie will die if he doesn’t get care and possible experimental treatment in Italy.

A British doctors group, The Medical Ethics Alliance, expressed its horror over the treatment of Alfie Evans that it called a “medical tyranny.”

And Italy’s Healthcare Chief has slammed the decisions by UK courts to treat Alfie the way that they had. The President of the Italian National Institute of Health lambasted the UK High Court’s decision yesterday on Alfie Evans’ that resulted it the children’s hospital being allowed to remove life support over Alfie’s parents’ objections.

Pope Francis repeatedly spoken on Alfie’s behalf and urged that Alfie’s parents be allowed to bring him to Italy.

Members of Parliament are leading a new campaign for a law to prevent the tragic situation happening to Alfie Evans and his parents from happening to any other family. The new campaign calls on MPs to debate the matter in the House of Commons – with potential plans for “Alfie’s Law.”

They saved a girl in Japan who killed herself in the forest there - she was 'dead' for hours but it was fairly cold in the forest on that day - they hooked her up to a bypass machine and slowly warned her and re-oxygenated her tissues - she was 'dead'  upon arrival but walked out on her own some days after - I don't recall how long she was 'dead' but it was many hours  but of course I presume the cold exposure is what benefited her as we've seen in cases of people going underwater for long periods in frigid temps and suffering no brain or organ damage - the bypass machine seems to work even more effectively than the typical warming that is given.

This is why they shouldn't have killed Alfie! (Some people have woken up after being in a coma 19 years!)

The little girl in coma who woke up singing Mamma Mia!

When young Layla Towsey fell into a coma after contracting meningitis, her family was told to give her a kiss goodbye. But it was far from the final curtain for the three-year-old, who awoke and began singing Abba's pop hit Mamma Mia!. The musical recovery came after she spent five days in coma, with mother Katy waiting only to see how disabled her daughter would be.

Layla was diagnosed with meningitis B and meningococcal septicaemia and spent the next five days unconscious in intensive care. But then Layla began singing the words to Mamma Mia!, having seen the film starring Meryl Streep. She was soon breathing by herself and only blood poisoning scars on her legs betrayed her ordeal.

But it was far from the final curtain for the three-year-old, who awoke and began singing Abba’s pop hit Mamma Mia!.

The musical recovery came after she spent five days in the coma, with mother Katy waiting only to see how disabled her daughter would be.

‘When I heard her singing Mamma Mia! quietly. I couldn’t believe it,’ said the 23-year-old. ‘I knew immediately she was going to be OK.’

The saga began last month when Layla developed a rash on her leg and started being sick.

‘When I picked her up, she didn’t recognise me and had a really high temperature,’ said Ms Towsey of Gidea Park, Essex.

She was taken to Queen’s Hospital, Romford, where doctors initially thought it was probably just a heat rash.

But Layla had become delirious so Ms Towsey said she insisted on more checks. Within hours, Layla had a heart attack and was transferred to St Mary’s Hospital in Paddington, west London, and put on life support.

‘Before they put her in the ambulance, we were told to give her a kiss goodbye. It was an awful moment,’ said Ms Towsey.

Layla was diagnosed with meningitis B and meningococcal septicaemia and spent the next five days unconscious in intensive care.

‘We’d been preparing ourselves as the life-support machine was keeping her alive,’ Ms Towsey added.

But then Layla began singing the words to Mamma Mia!, having seen the film starring Meryl Streep.

She was soon breathing by herself and only blood poisoning scars on her legs betrayed her ordeal. ‘When we took her for a check-up the consultant had tears in her eyes. She couldn’t believe what a good recovery Layla had made,’ said Ms Towsey.

The family now helps charity Meningitis UK raise money to help develop a vaccine for meningitis B.


Paralysed stroke victim experiences every patient's worst nightmare as he hears doctors discussing whether to donate his organs but couldn't speak out
    Jimi Fritze, 43, could hear but not talk after suffering brain haemorrhage
    Family surrounded hospital bed after doctors said he would not survive
    He eventually pulled through and is now taking action against hospital...


-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject:     Teen wakes up after Parents sign to Donate his Organs
Date:     Wed, 9 May 2018 05:25:51 +0000
From:     Chaplain Klingenschmitt, PhD <chaps@prayinjesusname.org>
Reply-To:     Chaplain Klingenschmitt, PhD <chaps@prayinjesusname.org>

Do you know 3 friends who should get these alerts?  Invite them to subscribe here.

Urgent Petition! Sign petition for "Life Begins at Conception" Act S.583 w/ Sen. Rand Paul. Select, sign, and WE WILL FAX your petition to all 100 Senators and 435 Congressmen instantly (saving you time!)  Or select free option to Amend S.583 here.
Teen wakes up after Parents sign to Donate his Organs "The parents of a 13-year-old Alabama boy with severe brain trauma signed away his organs to be donated — only for him to fully regain consciousness," reports NY Daily News. "Trenton McKinley lost consciousness two months ago when the trailer he was riding on flipped over, leaving him with little brain function and barely breathing. "Jennifer Reindl, his mother, was told there was little hope for her son, adding that he was dead for 15 minutes at one point. "They told me the oxidation problems would be so bad to his brain, that he would be a vegetable if he even made it," Reindl told Fox affiliate WALA. "Several days after the March accident, she decided to sign away his organs after being told there were five children who were a match. "We said yes, that also insured that they would continue to keep Trenton alive to clean his organs for the donation," she added. "He was scheduled to be taken off life support, but suddenly showed signs of function a day before doctors were going to pull the plug... "Since that time, he's regained most of his functions but still deals with seizures and nerve issues on a daily basis." [Dr. Chaps' comment:  God does miracles!  Thank God, those doctors didn't pull the plug or harvest his organs prematurely, because God knew this boy still needed them.]
Let's petition Congress to define life beginning at conception:
Urgent Petition! Sign petition for "Life Begins at Conception" Act S.583 w/ Sen. Rand Paul. Select, sign, and WE WILL FAX your petition to all 100 Senators and 435 Congressmen instantly (saving you time!)  Or select free option to Amend S.583 here.
16 babies born alive after failed Abortion attempts in this state "A total of sixteen babies have been born alive after attempted abortions in the state of Florida" in recent years, reports Live Action. "The information, collected by the state from abortion providers, is compiled in the report, 'ITOP Report of Infants Born Alive, By County Where Terminations Occurred, Florida,' on file at the Agency for Health Care Administration (AHCA). According to a spokesperson from the AHCA, ITOP stands for 'Induced Termination of Pregnancy.' "Thus far in 2018, one baby has been born alive in Florida during an abortion attempt. In 2017, there were 11 abortion survivors. There were none recorded born alive in 2016 or 2013, but there were four abortion survivors in 2015. "A previous Live Action News report noted that in 2015 alone, there were several reports of abortion survivors: one in Michigan, five in Minnesota, and, as already mentioned, four in Florida — three in Alachua County and one in Jackson County. That same year, 5,132 elective abortions were reportedly committed on women between the 13th and 24th week of pregnancy; that number has since been updated to 5,195 with a total of 5,695 for all reasons, including various 'health' reasons... "Infants born alive inside abortion facilities have haunted the abortion industry for many years, as Live Action News has documented several times. In fact, one national news outlet even dubbed the term the 'dreaded complication.' In 2013, Live Action’s undercover cameras exposed the chilling admissions of abortionists inside America’s late-term abortion industry during third trimester abortions and partial-birth abortions." [Dr. Chaps' comment:  The babies were alive before and after their births.  Abortion does not undo a pregnancy, it makes a woman the mother of a dead child.  Let's save them all, born or unborn.]
Let's petition Congress to define life beginning at conception:
Urgent Petition! Sign petition for "Life Begins at Conception" Act S.583 w/ Sen. Rand Paul. Select, sign, and WE WILL FAX your petition to all 100 Senators and 435 Congressmen instantly (saving you time!)  Or select free option to Amend S.583 here. Also see:

God Bless you, in Jesus' name, Chaplain Gordon James Klingenschmitt, PhD

Who is Dr. Chaps?   Bio here.

P.S.  Prefer to donate by postal mail?  Please write:  Pray In Jesus Name, PO Box 77077, Colorado Springs, CO  80970 Urgent Petition! Sign petition for "Life Begins at Conception" Act S.583 w/ Sen. Rand Paul. Select, sign, and WE WILL FAX your petition to all 100 Senators and 435 Congressmen instantly (saving you time!)  Or select free option to Amend S.583 here.

Pray In Jesus Name · PO Box 77077 · Colorado Springs, CO 80970 · USA