Subject: Chemtrails_5G_GMOs

Chemtrails / Global Warming / Climate Change

This is very serious; chemtrail spraying (geoengineering) has destroyed much of the ozone layer which is responsible for our protection (plants and animals), and we quite well may be beyond the point of no return. The UN at a CFR meeting years ago asked the US to not to proceed with spraying us with toxic metals until the safety of it could be tested. They warned that once started, it may be irreversible with disastrous consequences both if continued and if stopped, but the US and other NATO nations ignored them. (I have some links to the CFR meeting transcript and video on this webpage:

As if that is not enough, globalists are planning global wifi to help destroy the rest of the ozone layer.

Please share this information with friends, family, and your legislators before it is too late!

Please see below for more information about this.

Also, please see the following about the dangers of 5G WiFi and cellphone microwaves, and help stop them from being implemented in your country by sharing this information with as many people that you can, as well as your legislators and the White House, and warn people that they will cause a huge increase in cancers. I am a naturopathic cancer doctor who has a very healthy diet and lifestyle, but I still got malignant melanoma from using a cell phone every day for 2 hours to talk with my wife during my commute to work and home, and from the wifi routers close to me at work. I am doing well with high dosage vitamin C and herbs (along with healthy diet, lifestyle, faith/imagery/visualization/healing touch), but I would like to warn people who use a cell phone to not use them in a car or elevator because the phone goes on maxiumum power trying to escape the metal box and to reach a cell tower, and the microwaves bounce around the metal sides (just as they are reflected inside a microwave oven) until most of them are absorbed by you, causing hormone disruptions, DNA damage and cancer. People should minimize cell phone and wifi use (better to use wired router connections to computers, like they are changing back to in Europe for school children: see and to use the phone on speaker phone and hold it at arm's length from the body in order to reduce microwave absorption by the body (the inverse square law of power says that holding the phone 5 times farther than against your ear will reduce the power absorbed by you to 1/25th of what it would otherwise be [1/(5*5)]. See the website about wired earphones and BlueTooth also being dangerous. and sell air tubes (plastic tubes for which the electronic parts are located next to the cell phone, and the only thing going to you ear is a plastic tube, which does not conduct microwaves into your ear and brain (unlike wired earphones and BlueTooth do).

Thank you for your efforts to help warn and protect people.

On September 13, 2017, 180 scientists and doctors demanded a moratorium on the installation of 5G small cell tower infrastructure because of health concerns:

We, the undersigned, more than 180 scientists and doctors from 35 nations, recommend a moratorium on the roll-out of the fifth generation, 5G, for telecommunication until potential hazards for human health and the environment have been fully investigated by scientists independent from industry.

Scientists and Doctors Demand Moratorium on 5G Warning of Health Effects
Increased radiation from cell towers poses potential risks, say scientists from around the world.

Double Trouble That Will Do In Mother Nature: Electromagnetic Frequencies And Glyphosate, If Weather Geoengineering Doesn’t Get Us First
[syn: Roundup; 5G; cellphones; WiFi; EMF; Chemtrails; Global Warming; Climate Change; ]

News ALERT: WiFi street lamps emit radiation that causes insomnia, nosebleeds and stillbirths, officials deny reality
Wireless dangers: The health hazards of microwave radiation
5G technology gets overwhelmingly opposed in more than 200 cities
Brain cancer strongly linked to cell phone radiation in brand-new, large-scale study

The Moment of Truth Has Come! What Now? Threat to Life on Planet Earth: Ozone Dying and the Deadly Ultraviolet Cosmic Radiation
RiseEarth 2:09 PM World Truth
by Prof. Claudia von Werlhof; Global Research

There is no possibility of mistakes since 04.04.2018. Beyond all official claims and speculation about increasing CO2 emissions as a threat to earth's life there is now proof to the contrary. The real threat to life is the deadly ultraviolet cosmic radiation that in the meantime reaches the Earth's surface because the ozone layer can no longer stop it.

That means, that a part of the atmosphere, the famous and unique Blue of the planet Earth, that all the astronauts worship, is in is in the process of dissolution. The atmosphere thus no longer offers the protection for which it was created in the course of earthly life. Specifically, the ozone layer is disappearing, which is responsible for this protection. Already at the end of the Perm 250 million years ago nearly all life on earth became extinct, because nothing grew any more. The so-called "Great Dying" had then probably the same reason (Gabbattis 2018).

Today, the problem consists not only in the existence of the infamous ozone holes over the Antarctic and over the Arctic, too, but also in that they, contrary to expectations, make no attempt to close themselves (Titze 2018), and that the ozone layer as such has in the meantime generally become very weak (Dönges 2017). This means that it lets the cosmic radiation pass also far from the ozone holes themselves. That this is possible, has always been denied.

The bearer of the horrendous message is Dr. Marvin Herndon together with Raymond Hoisington and Mark Whiteside, who have their respective Research results just published in the "Journal of Geography, Environment and Earth Science International", Vol. 14, Issue 2, -- titled:

"Deadly Ultraviolet UV-C and UV-B Penetration to Earth's Surface: Human and Environmental Health Implications" (1)

In their article, the authors explain that UV-B radiation is a "stress factor", that has a negative influence on the survival and growth of organisms in marine and freshwater, for instance Plankton, both as vegetable as well as animal. Thus, the food base of the marine and generally water inhabitants is endangered. In addition, UV-B can affect the photosynthesis, growth and metabolism of the underwater world, it can disturb the coral reef communities and destroy them by coral bleaching as well as by leading to a genome instability of plants. However, UV radiation is also harmful on land, for example generally for trees because it alters their biological and chemical environment. Conifers can produce deficient pollen under UV-B radiation and be disturbed in their reproduction or even become sterile. The toxicity of UV-B is known. It also applies to all other living beings.

UV-C, again, has for example lethal effects on insects and microorganisms. It even leads to a programmed cell death in plants. In rats, it causes cell damage, in humans, depending on the duration of irradiation, at least skin damages. In the announcement of the publication, there is a summary:

It is widely believed that atmospheric ozone blocks the deadly portion of solar radiation, UV-C and most UV-B, from reaching Earth's surface. A just published scientific paper challenges this assumption. Published this week in the Journal of Geography, Environment and Earth Science International, the paper by J. Marvin Herndon, PhD, of Trans dyne Corporation, Raymond D Hoisington of I Ray Spectra Metrics, and Mark Whiteside, MD, MPH, a Florida Department of Health physician, confirms evidence NASA published and then failed to follow-up on in 2007."

NASA was informed since years

Eleven years ago, NASA scientists published the first evidence that UV-C and UV-B was penetrating the ozone layer and reaching Earth's surface, evidence now confirmed by Herndon et al. After D'Antoni et al.'s 2007 paper showed UV-C and UV-B reaching Earth's surface -- contrary to ethical protocols, NASA conducted no follow-up investigation, despite the grave implications of their own measurements. The article states:

'In science when a discovery is made that contradicts current understanding, scientists have the responsibility to attempt to refute the discovery beyond reasonable doubt. If unable to do so, the implications of the new discovery should be discussed in the scientific literature. The 2007 D'Antoni et al. discovery of UV-C radiation reaching Earth's surface should have been the subject of intense investigation by NASA for two reasons, one scientific and one ethical.

Despite the implication of NASA's 2007 findings for atmospheric science and despite their profound implications for human and environmental health, NASA failed to conduct a follow-up investigation.... This inaction begs the question: Is NASA complicit in a covert global activity, such as military 'national-defense' aerial jet-spraying of toxic coal fly ash that poses serious risks to life on Earth?

For at least 20 years, with ever increasing quantity and duration, the military has engaged in spraying particulate matter into the region where clouds form to manipulate and weaponize the atmosphere and weather. Analytical data on rain and snow samples are consistent with toxic coal fly ash as the main aerosolized substance being used. Since about 2010 this aerial spraying has become a near-daily, near-global operation. As the article reveals, the aerial spraying 'places vast amounts of chlorine, bromine, fluorine and iodine into the atmosphere all of which can deplete ozone... Potentially other substances in coal fly ash aerosols, including Nano-particulates, might adversely affect atmospheric ozone'.

Ozone depletion is now global and is allowing deadly ultraviolet to reach ground level. The article further notes, 'Ultraviolet radiation is the most harmful and genotoxic component of the solar radiation spectrum. The mutagenicity and lethal action of sunlight exhibit two maxima, both in the UV region of the spectrum. The authors 'provide introductory information on the devastating effects of UV-B and UV-C on humans, phytoplankton, coral, insects and plants'. The military might consider all this as 'collateral damage', but it is far more serious, threatening virtually all life on Earth.

Other reasons for the ozone dying: the entire military geoengineering

As much to Herndon et al. If we also think of Rosalie Bertell's study "Planet Earth. The Latest Weapon of War" (in German "Kriegswaffe Planet Erde"), then it becomes clear what besides the ongoing spraying of the atmosphere with nanoparticles, the so-called "Solar Radiation Management", SRM, which is now also officially aimed at by civilian geo engineers, has contributed to the destruction of the ozone layer and continues to contribute, indeed increasingly:

1. Radioactivity: There were 2,200 nuclear tests, including those with hydrogen bombs, in particular in the atmosphere between 1958 and 1998, 2/3 of which were carried out by the USA, 1/3 by the Soviet Union; to this adds the damage caused by accidents of nuclear power plants from Harrisburg to Chernobyl to Fukushima, which since 2011 has to be considered a permanent LAA (Largest Assumed Accident) that remains unstoppable and is responsible for the first appearance of an ozone hole over the Arctic; in addition there is the Nano dust of innumerable tons of uranium ammunition (DU ammunition from "depleted uranium", mostly waste from the nuclear industry) used in all wars since the first Gulf War in the Balkans, the Middle East and Afghanistan (recently Hänsel 2017); and there are certainly radioactive loads of which we know nothing (military secrecy), or which are not counted like the normal operation of nuclear power plants. Already in the 1950s Wilhelm Reich found out that radioactivity is destroying the vital energy he called "orgone", especially of the air (see Senf 2003).

2. Supersonic flights contribute to the destruction of the ozone layer in the atmosphere (which is why the civil Concorde project on the introduction of the supersonic flight in civilian traffic has been dropped).

3. Missile flights contribute to the destruction of the atmosphere because of their propellants, which partly work with plutonium (such as the 1997 Saturn Cassini rocket that arrived at Saturn in 2017).

4. The irradiation of the ionosphere with billions of watt-strong artificial electromagnetic waves through the worldwide installations of "ionospheric heaters", such as HAARP in Alaska, heat the ionosphere and charge it extremely, cutting it up and producing holes in it (s. Begich/Manning 2001). Each time the waves pass the underlying ozone layer.

5. The "Star Wars" activities of the military from space, the work on satellites and the formation of electronic grids to monitor, control and energetically influence the entire earth's space (recently Freeland 2018) in the form of a planetary "lockdown", as well as their earthly counterpart:

6. The microwaves, wireless energy transmission, mobile phone masts and in general the earthly production of cosmic radiation such as X-rays in medicine, food industry and everyday life.

7. Even "normal" air traffic has become one of the evildoers of ozone depletion (Herndon, 2017, already Loppow 1993), not to mention the spraying in the troposphere and the stratosphere with heavy metals and other toxic substances, which Herndon particularly mentions.

The whole program is implemented with the ongoing military "geoengineering" of the MIC, the Military-Industrial Complex (see Werlhof 2018).

What is to be done?

What we experience is an ongoing destruction process. It has now apparently reached a point where it suddenly changes, that is, it has begun to become irreversible. It took no more than 50 years to do so, assuming the unrecognized discovery of UV-B and -C radiation on Earth by NASA 2007. That's not much, considering that this process has triggered even planetary effects which, in fact, threaten nothing less than our survival on earth and even will end it if we -- meaning us as humanity per se -- don't do the right thing now.

Yet, the catastrophe has already begun: The "silent spring", predicted by Rachel Carson in the 1960s (Carson 1962), is already occurring. The decline in bird- and insect-populations between 40 and 70% has long since been noticed everywhere, as well as coral bleaching in the oceans, the emptiness of the Pacific Ocean after Fukushima and, in general, the daily extinction of animal and plant species (WWF 2008).

It is obvious that the process of destroying the atmosphere through military geoengineering should be stopped almost immediately, so that the earth has a chance to heal the wounds that were inflicted on it -- in particular ozone depletion. How long would that take? And: Would there be enough time to save earth's life and renew it? Or has this chance already passed? That would be the case if the effects felt today were only the first part of those which need 40-60 years to make themselves noticed, so that the whole rest would yet follow, and we would only be experiencing the beginning of what is already on the way...

In general, the recovery of the ozone layer has been calculated to last 50 years (see Ozone). But it did not happen because the conditions for it were not present at all. There have even been attempts to directly attack the ozone layer and experiment with it for a kind of "climate engineering", for example to produce an ozone hole over enemy territory. However, the person responsible, Harry Wexler, later before his death warned explicitly against it (Wexler 1962, see Fleming 2018). Now, however, one is amazed that the ozone layer has never been as thin as it is today, and that just above our heads (Läubli 2018), far away from the ozone holes!

But no matter how things are understood, we are to do something about the causes of ozone-dying, which until now have generally not been known to us and/or have been kept from us. There is no alternative -- anymore. Doing nothing is not an option and would mean in fact to agree with the suicide of humanity and its murder of all earthly life.

The previous thesis, which was advocated by science, however, still pretends that it is the CFCs in refrigerators that caused the ozone holes. Since CFCs is banned, there was hope the the ozone holes to be reduced. But this did not happen (Titze 2018, generally Ozone). Radioactivity and other substances and processes were never part of the debate anyway because the military is taboo and allowed to do what it wants to. This is what in the end we learned through the European Commission, when we, a European activist group, organized through "Sky guards", petitioned the European Parliament for a renewed review of geoengineering and its consequences (Fraile 2018). Military activities are of no concern of the Parliament, we were instructed from above.

If these activities, however, even without war, threaten all life on earth, and are about to destroy it, then what?

So far, such a view was not present in the public discussion at all and, when in doubt, has been considered a petty doom or a conspiracy theory. Now, nevertheless, there is proof that it is true and in which way that is the case. Even those who "already knew" have now the proof in their hands. That changes everything-

This proof is "the" message of the 21st century

For the first time and for all people on earth, there is no message that would be more important. Now everyone can know, and nobody can appeal not to have known. It would not help him anyway. Because it is no longer about any justification, but about the question of whether we as alleged "homo sapiens" manage to preserve life on earth in fact and as such -- or not, as we eventually allowed some of us to risk it in front of or behind our backs.

Yet: Who really understands this news after all the terrible ones that constantly are flooding us? Who "hears "them and their "Call"? Who lets them penetrate his or her armour? Who gets scared? Whom does it tear away from his chair? Who recognizes the brutal, even inexpressible truth that it communicates?

However, regardless of our reactions or their refusal: With this message, the world has already changed. There is a before and an after, no matter what we think of it. Objectively, from now on, everything has a different meaning, whatever we do or don't do, and whether we think about it or not, what is now known, namely that for the first time in history there is proof that we humans have already endangered the planet itself, whether we manage to save it, respectively the life on, in and above it, our own included, or not.

One thing is clear: The taboo that surrounds the military must fall. The social "movements" and politicians, however, who rely on "climate justice" and the end of civil CO2 emissions, immediately have to deal with the fact that they are absorbed in a myth, and the problem at stake is quite different from what they assumed -- knowingly or not. A radical rethinking will be needed ...

The necessary worldwide uprising

In other words: now that the evidence about the real problem is inevitably on the table, there must be a world-wide uprising followed by an equally global movement that can no longer be disconcert and confused. Because the military will not by itself stop doing what it does -- it has known for at least 11 years what it is doing! And this will not be the only thing it knows without us knowing it. At the moment, the military is even trying to get its entire program into civilian life through so-called civil geoengineering at universities around the world, a tactic that it has always used, because then it is all the more difficult to get rid of the military "achievements" again.
Greenpeace activists protest outside the Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO) shareholder's meeting held at The Prince Park Tower in Tokyo. They hold a banner which reads: "TEPCO: The worst Ever Polluting Company." TEPCO is the operator of the crisis-stricken Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant which has been emitting radiation since it was struck by an earthquake and tsunami on March 2011. The activists also raised a banner reading "No more nuclear" in Japanese, asking TEPCO to disengage from the nuclear industry.

Now we are to make sure to change this. In fact, we have no choice and most of all no time. This is true for all of us, namely "humanity" itself. It sounds unbelievable, but "we" must, objectively, achieve that:

no new radioactivity arises
the military stops supersonic flights
no more missiles fired into space
all ionospheric heater systems closed
the satellites shut down, no new ones installed
wireless power transmissions and
air traffic to be largely stopped
chemtrail spraying to be stopped

It does not seem that there is even the slightest chance of getting through with at least one of these points anywhere. And yet, that's what is on the agenda, whether it's going to work or not, and whether we want it or not.

Or do we humans want to perish together with the animals and plants of this earth and our own living conditions, without even having resisted, yes, without even having understood what was going on, because we, for example, did not recognize our own technology and therefore could not confront it, not to mention the machinations behind it ...? (See BUMERANG 3/2017).

That's how it is, suddenly. Everything turns out to be completely different than we always thought it to be. There is no mistake, no doubt anymore. It's a new time. The moment of truth has come. Now it's our turn, whether we like it or not, whether prepared or not, whether capable or not. It is up to us whether earthly life comes to an end or not -- and very quickly so, because all causes persist and are constantly being further developed.

Already in 2000 Rosalie Bertell warned us that if the ozone hole doubles, there will be no more agriculture on earth. Now it's about to get even worse. We certainly cannot wait until nothing grows anymore before we start to do something. That's obvious, isn't it? What an awakening it will be!

Text above was taken from 13th Information-Letter (April 2018) of PLANETARY MOVEMENT FOR MOTHER EARTH (PBME) -- see the link for further source information.

For the German version of this article, see here (Deutsche Fassung siehe hier).

Claudia von Werlhof is Professor of Political Science and Women's Studies at the University of Innsbruck, Austria.


1 Journal of Geography, Environment and Earth Science International, Vol. 14, Issue 2
J. Marvin Herndon, Raymond D. Hoisington and Mark Whiteside:
Deadly Ultraviolet UV-C and UV-B Penetration to Earth's Surface: Human and Environmental Health Implications

Putin: Western Governments Are Destroying The Planet With Chemtrails
1 Chemtrails, Putin 10:43 AM

Russian President Vladimir Putin has accused Western governments of geo-manipulation of the Earth's environment through chemical spraying operations designed to alter the world's climate and poison the population. Russia's Premier was made the statements whilst speaking at a fundraising event and claimed that the spraying of chemicals into the Earth's atmosphere via chemtrails is funded by corporations and sanctioned by governments.

putin accused the west of geoengineering warfare

Putin said that he was "deeply concerned" about the "uneducated risks" of altering our planet's climate and that it posed a "monumental threat" that was "against nature" and all in the pursuit of "population control and profit". YNW reports: At a charity fundraiser in his hometown St. Petersburg, President Putin was asked if Western governments' atmospheric spraying operations and weather manipulation programs represent the "greatest assault on the earth's life and human history.

"Putin said it does not matter if it is "the greatest threat, or the second greatest threat, or the third. What matters is that it is an assault. It is a serious assault." "It is remarkable that the American government is still refusing to acknowledge their operations.

The scientific data is there for all to see. How can people demand regulations and controls on operations if the government won't admit these operations exist? It is insulting to people's intelligence."

"It is not only offensive, it is against nature." The feeling in Russia is that Western governments and corporations are flying too close to the sun. But the problem is that they won't be the only ones to get burnt -- the earth as a whole will suffer the consequences of their actions.

As evidence emerges that geoengineering and climate manipulation is damaging the ozone layer, the fear is that the earth will reach a crisis point and will not be able to recover. The poisoned earth, like an incurably diseased body, will be left to die.

The alternative, according to Putin, is the same as it always has been. Simple, respectful treatment of the earth, water systems, and air. Asked if he would advise against his citizens spending time in heavily sprayed areas of the world, Putin said he would not tell people where to enjoy their holidays.


The Ozone Layer Recovery Lie And Climate Engineering Denial, Both Are Breaking Down
February 7, 2018 107 Comments
Related articles:
Dane Wigington
Until recently official sources have pushed the patently false narrative that Earth's ozone layer was recovering, that blatant lie is now becoming impossible to maintain. Our planet's ozone layer is disintegrating, climate engineering is the single greatest causal factor (though no "official" source is yet willing to admit to the ongoing covert climate engineering atrocities).
The Ozone layer is NOT recovering over some of Earth's most highly populated areas putting billions at risk of exposure to cancer-causing UV rays...

More related articles:

Mailing Address:
Dane Wigington
P.O. Box 9
Bella Vista CA 96008

Email Contact:

We review all incoming messages and do our best to respond, though we may not be able to in all cases due to our very demanding schedule in this ongoing battle, thank you for your understanding.

For those who wish to send photos / videos of geoengineered skies, use this email: Please include location, date, and who to give credit to for the photo / video, if it is posted.

THIS IS HOW IT ENDS: Thousands Of Scientists Sign 'Warning To Humanity' Letter Predicting An Imminent Apocalypse
November 13, 2017 30 Comments
The just issued warning from the science community in the article below may seem dire, but in fact, the warning falls far short of reality. Issues like the ozone layer collapse are completely glossed over in this new warning which simply pushes the official lie that the ozone layer is recovering (which, again, is patently false). The worsening ozone layer collapse alone has the potential to cause planetary omnicide in the next decade (or less) and that factor is not even considered in the warning from the scientists. Our collective reality will not be the same for much longer, collapse on many fronts is imminent and now very close. We are already well into the curve of the 6th mass extinction on our planet, is there any chance of salvaging what is yet left of Earth's life support systems? Perhaps that depends on that actions we collectively take, or don't. Time is not on our side, as the biosphere collapse becomes impossible to hide, the power structure will become more desperate and dangerous than ever. We must all do our part to sound the alarm, life on Earth is in the balance...
Read More:

Geoengineering is Destroying the Ozone Layer » Geoengineering is Destroying the Ozone Layer | Geoengineering Watch

Doctor Warns World About "Chemtrail Lung," a New Health Epidemic Causing Brain and Lung Problems Across Society

Global WiFi Will Cover Earth In Radiation And Destroy Ozone Layer - Your News Wire (syn: 5G)

Rain Tests Again Confirm 4 Geoengineering Related Metals: Skies are being Sprayed - RiseEarth

Geoengineering Whistleblower -- Ex-Military -- Kristen Meghan, Hauppauge, NY, January 18th, 2014 - YouTube

Geoengineering science: Aerosols impact cloud formation and weather; atmospheric scientists document the effects

Is It Fickle Mother Nature Or Determined Weather Geoengineering: Nor'easter No. 4 And Rainwater Analysis

Extensive List Of Patents » Extensive List Of Patents | Geoengineering Watch

The Geoengineering End Game

Local News Warns of a Fourth Snowfall and Geoengineering for Houston

Proof Of Geoengineering Discovered In New York Via New Images - Your News Wire

Dane Wigington exposes globalist geoengineering weather control agenda

Elana Freeland talking about 5G and the GeoEngineering connection - YouTube


Former United Nations Climate Expert Calls For Global Rules on Geoengineering
The U.N. report states that the effectiveness of geoengineering is "uncertain" and "in reducing the scale of one problem, other new problems would be created. Thus, there would also be risk of the geoengineering action also contributing to other drivers affecting biodiversity loss and ecosystem integrity." The U.N. concluded that although SRM may possibly slow the loss of Arctic sea ice, but not without "unacceptable climatic impacts elsewhere." The study found that the use of sulphur aerosols for SRM would be associated with a risk of stratospheric ozone loss... (Excerpt: see full article)

High Ranking CIA Agent Blows Whistle On The Deep State And Shadow Government

11 Common Symptoms of the Global Depopulation Slow Kill (syn: eugenics)

Weather Warfare Explained
Published on Oct 12, 2012
Corbett Report Radio #237
Tonight we delve into the archives to highlight conversations with Michel Chossudovsky, Rosalind Peterson, Michael Murphy and G. Edward Griffin on the subject of chemtrails, geoengineering, environmental modification and weather warfare. Join us tonight as we delve into the weaponry of the future that's already here in the present.

Corbett Report Radio 237 -- Weather Warfare Explained

Geoengineering: Destroying the Atmosphere - Rosalind Peterson
Published on Nov 7, 2011
Radio Liberty Seminar, October 23, 2011, Aptos, California. Rosalind Peterson and Allan Buckmann present their findings relating to geoengineering.
To download the PowerPoint presentation and a host of documents, please visit:
To support the seminar organizers, please visit:
Also see:

Rosalind Peterson: The Chemtrail Cover-Up
Published on Dec 21, 2010
Rosalind Peterson of California Skywatch was a certified U.S.D.A. Farm Service Agency Crop Loss Adjustor working in more than ten counties throughout California. She now spearheads a watchdog group that monitors uncontrolled experimental weather modification programs, atmospheric heating and testing programs, and ocean and atmospheric experimental geoengineering programs Peterson is at the forefront of the chemtrail research field and how the unexplained patterns that scar our skies are "causing detrimental human health effects and environmental degradation."
In this 1-hour plus video exclusive for Prison members, Peterson reveals how she was first spurred to investigate chemtrails after being alerted to them by someone at the Mendocino County Probation Department. Peterson then began to intensely study the phenomenon and note that aircraft producing the trails would circle the county in a clock-like loop, covering the entire area with a cloudy haze in as little as three hours. Peterson cites NASA studies showing that the chemtrails turn into man-made clouds, exacerbating artificial climate change. However, Peterson states her contention that NASA is attempting to cover-up the true nature of chemtrails and convince people that they are a natural phenomenon, a ruse dutifully parroted by top weather and satellite observatories, who as Peterson explains acknowledge the fact that man-made chemtrails are changing the weather yet still label them as natural weather fronts in their public broadcasts.
Peterson shows a map provided by the FAA which reveals how "intra-flights" - mainly of military origin - are causing the chemtrails by flying in loops around counties in flight paths that differ substantially from normal airline trajectories. The flights have no other obvious purpose than to disperse chemtrails because they have no fixed destination, they merely fly around and around in circles.
As proponents of geoengineering like Obama's science czar John P. Holdren have proposed, blocking sunlight is a primary effect of chemtrailing, and sulphur could be one of the chemicals being dispersed by these trails. As Peterson explains, sulphur has been linked with a host of health problems, which is why California removed it from diesel fuel in the first place.
After studying water quality samples for the state of California stretching back some 30 years, Peterson found that starting from 1990, water sources were all registering unusual spikes in certain chemicals at precisely the same time, namely arsenic, barium, aluminum, calcium, manganese, magnesium, lead and iron. By measuring the spikes in these chemicals in the water supply with similar spikes in these chemicals in air quality samples, Peterson was able to conclude that the cause was airborne and that it had to be coming from the atmosphere. Peterson notes that mixing aluminum and barium creates clouds and that NASA experiments based around this concept were coinciding with the spikes in such chemicals measured in water and air quality samples.
This is an enlightening, detailed and documented explanation of how chemtrailing is being conducted, who is responsible for it and what the consequences are for our health and the environment.

Published on Jan 17, 2015
SHOCKING NEW INTERVIEW CHEMTRAILS SHOCKING NEW INTERVIEW! CHEMTRAILS Kristen Meghan US Air Force Whistle Blower! US Air Force Whistle Blower! Kristen Meghan Edwards.
*_GOV PAID DISINFORMATION TROLLS Are Out of their Minds Crazy about this Video! Attacking THIS CHEMTRAILS Video with FULL FORCE! They must be running scared again! READ the comments under this video, they are CRAZY!!!!!_* #KristenMeghan

Pilots, Doctors & Scientists Tell Truth about Chemtrails [Excerpts]
John Kuhles
Published on Oct 2, 2014
DO NOT COPY! if you have no permission from Dane Wigington -- sub: -- credits video: Dane Wigington Oct 26th, 7:40am [quote] Hello John, I am grateful that you are trying to expose the dire issue of climate engineering. I am sorry you got hit by the copyright complaint I had to file. I am writing you this letter as a courtesy so that you do not get hit with another strike regarding this video . I have never filed any such copyright complaint and people all over the world repost my work all the time. The paragraph below is what I sent to the original party that posted the edited version. If you make the corrections I outlined below, and re-upload the video making clear that geoengineeringwatch and my youtube channel is the source (instead of the appearance in the beginning of the edited video that it was produced by "galactic service"), then I would be absolutely fine with you re-posting this video. I have never filed any copyright complaint before, I don't want to do it again if it can possibly be avoided. Original video
(The letter I sent to person that posted the edited version in a deceptive manner)
Hello Johannes, I actually had people contacting me and asking if I knew of or had any connection to the video in question that you posted. It seemed that considerable effort was made to mask the source of the video and create the appearance that the video was done by your group (Galactic Service). You did not in any way give credit to as the source of the video, showing a youtube link far below your verbiage is not sufficient in this kind of situation. Others then downloaded from your copy and did not even properly show the links so there was no original youtube link whatsoever. I have always allowed any and all use of GeoengineeringWatch information and data so long as those that reposted this data properly and respectfully credited the source. Our goal is to get credible and verifiable data out to the public, nothing more. I have never sold a single thing on my site. Not only have I never made a cent, I have spent the whole of my retirement account on this battle. In regard to the video you uploaded, I paid for the organization of the event, I paid for the filming, I paid for the editing, and the downloading. As I mentioned, countless other sites repost data all the time, some have over 730,000 views on my presentations, but they properly credited the source so I have no issue with their reposting. Some sites that just reposted your version push conclusions that are completely unsupported by factual data. This means that what I worked so hard to produce is now bringing attention to sites that are not putting out credible information. This completely defeats everything I have worked toward for over 10 solid years. My life's energy is focus on one cause, exposing and stopping global climate engineering.
Dane Wigington

CHEMTRAILS DOCUMENTARY-- Facts and Proof ---What Are ChemTrails? Do YOU care?

Chemtrails, Here is your PROOF 100% Real "MUST WATCH"
Alex Alexander
Published on Mar 23, 2014
Rosalind Peterson Confirms Chemtrails/Geoengineering/SRM
Are Very real.
If you are still in doubt that them lines in the sky are contrails or that the milky haze which lingers all day is NOTHING TO WORRY ABOUT, then you are very mistaken
This is PROOF 100% Real.
Please watch and share.

SURVIVAL: Chem-trails & FirstAid

WHAT in the World Are They Spraying? (part.1)
What in the world are they spraying. Full video.

"Why in the World are They Spraying?" Documentary HD (multiple language subtitles)
Why in the World are They Spraying? (Full Length w/ Foreign Language Subtitles)
Published on Aug 18, 2012
People around the world are noticing that our planet's weather is dramatically changing. They are also beginning to notice the long lingering trails left behind airplanes that have lead millions to accept the reality of chemtrail/geoengineering programs. Could there be a connection between the trails and our severe weather? While there are many agendas associated with these damaging programs, evidence is now abundant which proves that geoengineering can be used to control weather. In this documentary you will learn how the aerosols being sprayed into our sky are used in conjunction with other technologies to control our weather. While geoengineers maintain that their models are only for the mitigation of global warming, it is now clear that they can be used as a way to consolidate an enormous amount of both monetary and political power into the hands of a few by the leverage that weather control gives certain corporations over the Earth's natural systems. This of course, is being done at the expense of every living thing on the planet. Directed/Produced by Michael J. Murphy and Produced/Edited by Barry Kolsky.. Written by Michael J. Murphy and Barry Kolsky.

Chemtrails: WHY in the World are They Spraying? (NEW 2012 Full Documentary - HD) [CC]
Chemtrail Crimes
Published on Aug 19, 2012
People around the world are noticing that our planet's weather is dramatically changing. They are also beginning to notice the long lingering trails left behind airplanes that have lead millions to accept the reality of chemtrail/geoengineering programs. Could there be a connection between the trails and our severe weather? While there are many agendas associated with these damaging programs, evidence is now abundant which proves that geoengineering can be used to control weather. In this documentary you will learn how the aerosols being sprayed into our sky are used in conjunction with other technologies to control our weather. While geoengineers maintain that their models are only for the mitigation of global warming, it is now clear that they can be used as a way to consolidate an enormous amount of both monetary and political power into the hands of a few by the leverage that weather control gives certain corporations over the Earth's natural systems. This of course, is being done at the expense of every living thing on the planet.
Interviews with:
Dane Wigington - Solar Expert/Climate Researcher
Francis Mangels - USDA Bioliogist
Barb Petersen - Farmer/Rancher/Researcher/Radio Host/
Rosalind Petersen - Retired USDA Farm Service / President of the Agriculture Defense Coalition -
Mark McCandlish - Defense & Aerospace Industry
Scott Stevens - Former TV Weatherman 20+yrs
* subtitles [CC] available
Dr. Nick Begich - H.A.A.R.P. Expert & Author of "Angels Don't Play This H.A.A.R.P." -
Dr. James Fleming - Professor of Science Technology & Society College
Michael Agne - Commodities trader
Larry Oxley - Investor
Sherrie Klappert- Organic Farmer (Hawaii)
Joel Gilcoca Organic Farmer
Karoline Muniz - GMO Free Lecturer Holistic Health Care Provider
Foster Gamble - "thrive"
Daisy Agne
Horace Ross
End Song by Skull "Cry Die"
WHAT in the World Are They Spraying? (part.1)
*Feel free to download and re-upload this documentary to your channel as there is NO COPYRIGHT and is actually encouraged by the producers to copy the DVD versions and redistribute because raising awareness most important.
(I use - just copy/paste URL) ************

What the Hell Are They Spraying? Lionel Interviews Dane Wigington of GeoEngineering Watch
Lionel Nation
Published on Jan 10, 2018
Just look up. In the sky. Look. What do you see? From jets. High above. Those hazy, gauzy streaks of something. Crosshatched and thatched, hashtagged crisscrossed streams and plumes and streaks. Of something. Contrails? Water vapor? Ice crystals? Not a chance. These plumes and trails spread over huge swaths of land. But what are they? Dane Wigington of joins me in what may very well be the most critical issue and problem that faces all of us. And all you have to do is look up. And don't call them chemtrails.

Willem Felderhof - An Airline Pilot Discusses Aerotoxic Syndrome, Chemtrails, & Geoengineering
Veritas Radio

Published on Dec 13, 2017
You can support further projects with a donation on:
OVERCAST is a groundbreaking documentary about a phenomenon that most of us would consider normal: Jet contrails that spread into clouds, covering the sky and blocking the sun. For some people however, these trails are the biggest environmental crime in the history of mankind. Recent studies show that manmade cirrus clouds through flight traffic have a far bigger impact on climate change than previously assumed and are already described as unintentional Geoengineering.
OVERCAST brings light into a phenomenon that should be part of the public and climate debate, but instead has been mostly ignored so far.

"Chemtrails" -- How They Affect You and What You Can Do
THRIVE Movement
Published on Aug 1, 2013
Stay informed, subscribe to our mailing list:
For more information, including links mentioned in the video, please visit:
Watch THRIVE for FREE at:
Follow us on Facebook:
Have you noticed more planes flying overhead in your community that leave trails behind them in the sky? These patterns are the result of "weather modification" programs -- also referred to as "solar radiation management" or "chemtrails". The international program involves spraying aluminum, barium, strontium and other toxic chemicals from airplanes at high altitudes that then fall to the ground, ending up in our bodies, our water, our soil and the air we breathe.
Thank you to GeoEngineering Watch, Chemtrails 911, Space Weather, SkyderAlert, Rob Leslie, Ray Gale, truthseeker1922 and Skull for chemtrail footage that helped make this video possible.

Matt Landman
Published on Jun 20, 2017
FrankenSkies is an 80 minute social change documentary regarding the Solar Geoengineering/Chemtrail agenda that affects every living being on earth. The struggle of bringing awareness to this subject, despite the obstacles of a socially engineered populace and the military industrial complex with its endless resources, is palpable in this awakening truth feature.
An impeccably timed eye opening expose, the film reveals the campaign to normalize chemical cloud formations via atmospheric aerosol dispersals. Up against a normalization timetable encompassing a controlled media and an indoctrinated educational and political system, activists ask the question: Is your silence your consent?
A shocking informative film on climate engineering, frequency control and CIA manipulation, the film's narrative unfolds through a historical timeline of experimentation on humanity, bringing us to a modern day laboratory that encompasses the air we breathe and dictates when and where the sun shall shine, or not...

Insider Reveals Their Plans with Chemtrails & How To Survive

Environmentalists 'SCARED STIFF' As Pruitt Plans To Reveal 'Secret Science' Tyranny
Despite the "science" used to declare climate change such a human problem that taxes and job debilitating regulations be enforced already much-known as "junk," Pruitt intends to let everyone know that they've been duped in order to be treated like cash cows and government slaves...

Geoengineering Watch Global Alert News, April 21, 2018, #141 ( Dane Wigington )
Dane Wigington
Published on Apr 21, 2018
Our hope and goal is for this video to be shared far and wide, DO NOT re-upload this copyrighted video without prior written permission and conditions from
How much longer can the majority of industrialized / militarized societies hide from reality? Not long. Foundations of power structures are fracturing from every direction, many critical issues are finally beginning to come to light. Though this is, in many ways, a leap in the right direction, it also leads to unbridled desperation on the part of those who wield power. Are radio programs on the political left or right mentioning anything about the most critical threats we face? No. A week after America's latest illegal and unjust bombing of a sovereign nation (Syria), how many Americans even remember? How many care? Regions of South America are sliding toward chaos, has US mainstream media said a word? The US Air Force is desperately trying to put nearly 200 additional jet aircraft tankers into service. Is this for the purpose of increasing the ongoing toxic atmospheric spraying to even more extreme levels? How much longer can the biosphere and the web of life sustain the assault? Where do we go from here?
With every passing day the more and more are finally waking up to the rapidly darkening horizon, it is up to all that are already awake to continue sounding the alarm. In doing so, it is imperative to share data that is factually on completely solid ground, anything less inevitably leads to the marginalization of the critical climate engineering cause. Make your voice heard, while it can still make a difference.
Dane Wigington
To follow us on Facebook, click here:
To follow the latest videos please subscribe to our four youtube channels below:
Dane Wigington
Geoengineering Watch
Geo Watch
The latest and most effective awareness raising materials can be found at the links below:
2 sided color glossy informational flyers:
Climate Engineering Fact And Photo Summary » Climate Engineering Fact And Photo Summary Geoengineering Watch
20 page fact and photo summary booklets:
To support
To view the locations and photo credits of the images shown, click here:
Geoengineering Watch Photo Gallery - Home Facebook

Geoengineering Watch Global Alert News, April 28, 2018, #142 ( Dane Wigington )
Dane Wigington

CIA Whistleblower Speaks Out About Climate Engineering, Vaccination Dangers, and 911
Dane Wigington

Geoengineering Whistleblower -- Ex-Military -- Kristen Meghan, Hauppauge, NY, January 18th, 2014
Published on Jan 27, 2014
NOTE: Please be patient as Kristen has received an overwhelming number of emails for lab requests and will answer them all as soon as possible.
Kristen Meghan, Ex-Military, former Air Force Sr. Industrial Hygienist/Environmental Specialist. Her job was Air Force Specialty Code (AFSC) was 4BOX1, Bio-environmental Engineer.
Kristen gave a ground breaking presentation of what she had discovered about Geoengineering / Chemtrails while serving her Country.
This BRAVE young lady has put her livelihood / life on the line for us.
This presentation was produced, filmed and edited by John F. King
David Keith Discussing *Weather Modification* on Colbert Report -- Dec. 2013
David W Keith and Andy Parker, Scientific American, Jan2013, Vol. 308, p34-36.
Impacts of Geoengineering Using Stratospheric Aerosols
Geoengineering Watch
Ex-Military Bio-Environmental Engineer | Kristen Meghan | Blows Whistle On Air Force | Chemtrails
GeoEngineering and the Global Assault -- A Round Table Discussion with Dane Wigington, George Barnes and Dr. Doug Levine
Kristen Meghan YouTube Channel
Kristen Meghan Facebook Account
Kristen Meghan Twitter Account
Sulfuric Acid on a paper towel:

3 Mineral Waters That Can Remove Aluminum from the Brain

Horsetail Herb removes toxic ALUMINUM from your body with SILICA!
Published on May 14, 2017
The Health Ranger reveals why Horsetail herb, which grows as a weed, allows your body to eliminate toxic ALUMINUM, a heavy metal linked to Alzheimer's and dementia. (It's also found in popular deodorant products.)

The Metals Capturing Capacity discovery that protects you from toxic heavy metals
Published on Jan 8, 2014
This mini-documentary features Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, announcing his discovery and documentation of the Metals Capturing Capacity of foods, botanicals, superfoods and dietary substances.
See parts 1 and 2 that precede this video at

Owning the weather by 2025
Published on Apr 30, 2018
This is a plan that the government and the military have had since the 60s as far as I know they have wanted to on the weather and to do so baby to condition and program all of humanity it appears 2025 they are well ahead of schedule

Doctor Confirms Worldwide Chem-Lung Disease; Daily Chemtrail Spraying is Relentless Now

John Knox and Julie Molesky at Geoengineering March 4/21/18
John Graf
Published on Apr 21, 2018
I am so proud and inspired by friends like this who know how dangerous and devastating these crimes are in our skies are. Thank you John and Julie for making this event a success. We did run into many people today who KNEW...and were relieved to share their concerns with others ...who will not ridicule them. So many have friends and family members who laugh and roll their eyes around them. All will be very devastated when they learn the truth. Watch these what they are doing. This is crop dusting on a Global Level people. Please know we are telling you the truth.

John Knox: I DO NOT CONSENT. April 21, 2018
John Graf
Published on Apr 21, 2018
A quick clip from today's Global March Against Geoengineering showing the criminals spraying the sky as we march. Thanks John Knox.

Nick Rogers: Photographer/ Chemtrail Researcher 4/21/18
John Graf
Published on Apr 21, 2018
I met a new awake person at out Global March Against Geoengineering today. He was awake and I am always so happy to meet another person who knows, and sees the obvious crimes against all of us. Thank you Nick Rogers. Shot in Santa Monica Calif.

Snowden Warns Us Of Major Event! Secret Weather Control Program Exposed 2017
Published on Apr 29, 2017
Snowden Warns Us Of Major Event! Secret Weather Control Program Exposed 2017! #1 Most Viewed UFO Youtube Channel Thirdphaseofmoon Shares Your Incredible UFO Videos To the World! Upload your UFO Video To Youtube, Then Copy Paste The Link To My Email! Keep Your Eyes on the Skies! We are not Alone!

Top Scientist Tells CBS: HAARP Responsible For Recent Hurricanes - What is Cloud Seeding?
Published on Sep 9, 2017
World renowned physicist Dr. Michio Kaku made a shocking confession on live TV when he admitted that HAARP is responsible for the recent spate of hurricanes.

In an interview aired by CBS, Dr. Kaku admitted that recent 'made-made' hurricanes have been the result of a government weather modification program in which the skies were sprayed with nano particles and storms then "activated" through the use of "lasers".

In the interview (below), Michio Kaku discusses the history of weather modification, before the CBS crew stop him in his tracks.

The High-Frequency Active Auroral Research Program (HAARP) was created in the early 1990's as part of an ionospheric research program jointly funded by the U.S. Air Force, the U.S. Navy, the University of Alaska Fairbanks, and the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA).

According to government officials, HAARP allows the military to modify and weaponize the weather, by triggering earthquakes, floods, and hurricanes. reports: One detail in a plethora of academic papers and patents about altering the weather with electromagnetic energy and conductive particles in the stratosphere, research published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences said the "laser beams" can create plasma channels in air, causing ice to form. According to Professor Wolf Kasparian:

"Under the conditions of a typical storm cloud, in which ice and supercooled water coexist, no direct influence of the plasma channels on ice formation or precipitation processes could be detected.

Under conditions typical for thin cirrus ice clouds, however, the plasma channels induced a surprisingly strong effect of ice multiplication.

Within a few minutes, the laser action led to a strong enhancement of the total ice particle number density in the chamber by up to a factor of 100, even though only a 10-9 fraction of the chamber volume was exposed to the plasma channels.

The newly formed ice particles quickly reduced the water vapor pressure to ice saturation, thereby increasing the cloud optical thickness by up to three orders of magnitude."

To really understand geoengineering, researchers have identified defense contractors Raytheon, BAE Systems, and corporations such as General Electric as being heavily involved with geoengineering. According to Peter A. Kirby, Massachusetts has historically been a center of geoengineering research.

With the anomalous hurricanes currently ravaging the Americas, floods destroying India, and wildfires destroying the Pacific Northwest, weather warfare is a topic on the public consciousness right now. Please share this with as many people as possible.

Our Official Online Store :

Every sale will help this channel keep going.

My YouTube Channel:

Add me up on Facebook if you like:

Find me on Steemit Here:

Fan Funding can be accepted on Patreon or my Bitcoin Wallet. You can visit my profile here:

My Bitcoin Wallet Address: 17S5o2Thyqcw9TqtFyQAQdAtjSwJJ95rcE

PayPal Address:

Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted.
"Fair Use" guidelines:

Oregon Weather man former Military officer exposes the Gov's weather modification secrets on live tv
Siriusknowledge DCCLXXVII
Published on Apr 11, 2016
One factor that's commonly overlooked when it comes to talking about human health and environmental degradation is geo-engineering and Solar Radiation Management (SRM), also known as "chemtrails."
The name seems to come from the fact that various geo-engineering and SRM programs use stratospheric aresols like barium, nano aluminum-coated fiberglass [known as CHAFF], radioactive thorium, cadmium, chromium, nickel, desiccated blood, mold spores, yellow fungal mycotoxins, ethylene dibromide, polymer fibers and more.

Chemtrails help to alter the weather HAARP is what controls the weather at times so not every Snow storm and hurricane is done by HAARP but you can tell which ones are.

Geoengineering could cause more harm than climate change
US research finds policy and politics could turn a technological fix into a climate disaster. Stephen Fleischfresser reports...

Geoengineering and Weather Modification Exposed
By Jim Lee * Subscribe on YouTube
Last Updated · Saturday, Nov 18, 2017
Published · Thursday, Jan 3, 2013
Geoengineering and Weather Modification Exposed
The most extensive research on Geoengineering and Weather Modification experiments worldwide, with articles, maps, and timelines to fully expose the hidden world of Weather Control.

"Accidental Geoengineering" with Ship Tracks and Contrails
Jim Lee
Published on Mar 23, 2018
ClimateViewer News (blog)
ClimateViewer 3D (map)
Weather Modification History (timeline)

Ionospheric Heaters - How HAARP really works
Jim Lee
Published on Dec 17, 2014
Ionospheric Heaters: How HAARP really works

HAARP and the Sky Heaters

HAARP Timeline:


How Jets Make Metal Clouds - JUST THE FACTS
Jim Lee
Published on Apr 19, 2018


Geoengineering and Weather Modification Exposed

HAARP and the Sky Heaters

The Environmental Modification Accountability Act #ENMODAA

ClimateViewer News (blog)

ClimateViewer 3D (map)

Weather Modification History (timeline)

About Jim Lee:



If you appreciate my hard work, buy me a coffee:


Geoengineering, Weather Modification, and Weaponizing Nature
Jim Lee
Published on May 23, 2017

A Presentation by Jim Lee of ClimateViewer News given at the Freedom Force International's 3rd Congress in Phoenix, Arizona. December 3, 2016. G. Edward Griffin's "Global Warming: an Inconvenient Lie"

(2:08) Rainmaker Charles Hatfield and the Lake Morena dam failure
(2:45) birth of cloud seeding 1946
(3:07) Project Cirrus: first cloud seeding on tropical storm
(3:39) Irving P. Krick invents ground-based cloud seeding generator
(4:02) map of cloud seeding projects 1952-1965
(4:12) chemtrails 1958
(4:33) US Navy makes clouds with carbon black 1958
(4:55) map of cloud seeding projects 1961-1988 (Project Skywater)
(5:43) Space Weather Modification begins
(6:11) strontium and barium ion cloud in space (sounding rockets and satellites)
(6:51) chemtrail lawsuit 1970 - New Jersey and Illinois sue airline industry over "smoke pollution of the skies"
(7:26) WEATHER WARFARE: Operation Popeye
(8:57) weather modification reporting laws and forms (1972, 1976)
(10:36) why ENMOD has no teeth
(10:48) modern cloud seeding and the Blue Gold Rush (Water Wars)
(12:15) dept. of homeland security hurricane control
(12:59) USAF and USN carbon black weather warfare FOIAs, Owning the Weather, Weather Modification Test Technology Symposium 97
(14:26) cloud ionizers - electric rainmaking
(15:10) steering atmospheric rivers
(16:27) GEOPHYSICAL WARFARE - Ionospheric Heaters and electromagnetic emissions
(17:51) HAARP
(20:23) HAARP on a Boat: why the military sold HAARP to the Univ. of Alaska
(24:00) Bill Gates FICER and funding geoengineering lobbyists
(28:48) Artificial Clouds: Ship tracks
(29:54) Artificial Clouds: Contrail Cirrus
(32:02) Chemtrail terminology and "Accidental Geoengineering"
(34:27) EPA hearing (Aug. 2015) on Chemtrails
(36:45) Rogue Geoengineering, Clandestine Operations, and ENMOD

Jim Lee To Present Geoengineering Research At Ed Griffin's Global Warming; An Inconvenient Lie (Nov 2016)

ClimateViewer News (blog)

ClimateViewer 3D (map)

Weather Modification History (timeline)

About Jim Lee:


Support ClimateViewer:

If you appreciate my hard work, buy me a coffee:

Unless someone like you cares a whole awful lot, nothing is going to get better. It's not. -- Dr. Seuss

Climate Intervention Is Not a Replacement for Reducing Carbon Emissions; Proposed Intervention Techniques Not Ready for Wide-Scale Deployment

IPCC special report on 1.5C - draft summary for policymakers
Uploaded by Megan Darby on Feb 13, 2018
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change is compiling evidence on the impacts of and pathways to 1.5C global warming, the aspirational limit in the Paris Agreement. This is the draft of the summary for policymakers due to be finalised in September 2018.

Liberal Climate Scientists Hate Our America & We Must Stop It! An Unbiased Patriotic Rejection of Climate Change
by Dalton Pepper

The Politically Incorrect Guide to Climate Change
by Marc Morano

"Why in the World are They Spraying?" Documentary HD

What in the World Are They Spraying? (Full Length HD Version)

Who in the World is Spraying? promo



Dane Wigington-Chemtrail Lawsuit to Stop Damaging Spraying Filed in Canada

Billionaire Bilderberger Busted Building Bioweapons - #NewWorldNextWeek

Must Watch: Climatologist Breaks the Silence on Global Warming Groupthink
Published on Dec 13, 2015
Must Watch: Climatologist Breaks the Silence on Global Warming Groupthink
Dr. Judith Curry is Professor and former Chair of the School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences at the Georgia Institute of Technology. Following is her verbal remarks as delivered to last week's US Senate Commerce Committee Hearing on "Data or Dogma? Promoting Open Inquiry in the Debate Over the Magnitude of the Human Impact on Earth's Climate."

CIA Funding Geoengineering to Weaponize Weather - #NewWorldNextWeek
Published on Feb 19, 2015
Welcome to New World Next Week -- the video series from Corbett Report and Media Monarchy that covers some of the most important developments in open source intelligence news. This week:
Story #1: Spy Agencies Fund Climate Research in Hunt for Weather Weapon
CIA Funding Geoengineering to Weaponize Weather
Chemtrails Exposed: A History of the New Manhattan Project
CIA Accuses Russia Of "Manipulating The World's Weather"
Flashback: Operation Popeye - Weaponized Weather During Vietnam War

LOOK! Proof U S Attacked the Philipines with Weather Warfare! - YouTube

Antarctica Is the Key to Controlling the Weather - YouTube

The Government Has Manipulated Our Weather for Decades - YouTube

The Real Reason Weather IS Manipulated - YouTube

Snowden Warns Us Of Major Event! Secret Weather Control Program Exposed 2017 - YouTube

News With Views | Stormy Daniels, A Weather Modification Weapon, And Trumpocalypse

Global Weather Modification Assault Causing Climate Chaos And Environmental Catastrophe

Introduction to weather trading, weather derivatives and weather risk management - Artemis Reading Library

The California Drought Is Being Caused By Weather Manipulation - YouTube

The Carnegie Council Calls for Global Governance to Regulate Geoengineering
By Derrick Broze

As the Carnegie Council calls for global governance to regulate climate engineering, advocates and opponents of the controversial technology prepare for a looming policy debate.

On December 8, the Carnegie Council released an essay calling for policymakers to invest resources into creating new forms of governance as a response to increasing calls for climate engineering, or geoengineering. The essay is part of a growing push for funding for research into the controversial science of modifying or engineering the climate, and a recent push towards global government which could regulate the technology. Geoengineering is the deliberate and large-scale manipulation of the weather and climate using a variety of technologies. One popular form of geoengineering promoted by scientists is known as Solar Radiation Management (SRM), which involves spraying aerosols from planes equipped with particulates designed to reflect sunlight in an effort to combat "anthropogenic global warming."

We are potentially at the dawn of an age of geoengineering. It is time for policymakers to start discussing whether geoengineering is to go forward and, if so, how. -- The Need For Governance of Climate Engineering, Carnegie Council

The essay, published in the Council's peer-reviewed journal Ethics & International Affairs, starts out by stating that lawmakers around the world need to accept the "uncomfortable reality" that man-made climate change is causing environmental destruction. "Despite the best efforts of national governments and thousands of mayors and other civic leaders, we can no longer contain global average temperatures to below 1.5--2 degrees Celsius above preindustrial levels through mitigation of carbon emissions alone," the author writes.

According to the report, the answer to this apparently unstoppable apocalypse will likely include some form of geoengineering and policymakers need to have these important discussions and debates. The author describes the resurgent interest in geoengineering and stresses the increasing likelihood that "a group of countries or cities or even one or more wealthy individuals might decide to deploy geoengineering technologies during the coming decades."

The author does a great job of illustrating the need to find answers to difficult and complex questions. For example, the Council asks, "How would we govern such actors? Who assesses the balance of risks and rewards when deploying geoengineering technologies? What safeguards and what compensation mechanisms need to be built in? If we start deliberately altering global temperatures, who controls the global thermostat?"

The Carnegie Council previously created the Carnegie Climate Geoengineering Governance Initiative to "bring the profoundly complex issues of geoengineering governance and ethics to a much wider audience." The new essay is part of the effort to bring these issues to the minds of policymakers and the general population. The author does not hesitate to emphasize the goal of international or supranational governance for climate engineering. Emphasis added:

In other words, the real question facing humanity might not be whether or not to go ahead with geoengineering technologies, but how to govern them when they inevitably arrive. This will require a high degree of knowledge about geoengineering technologies, and will entail a considerable amount of work to understand the risks. This is something no one group can do alone. The world as a whole needs to deal with this, involving all levels of society.

The Carnegie Council acknowledges that the effort to build a "wider geoengineering governance community" has already begun. "Many of our staff come from a United Nations and intergovernmental background, and we have already engaged with many governments, international organizations, and nongovernmental actors," the report states. The council is also working with "numerous nonstate actors active in the climate and sustainable development space" and religious leaders. "Ultimately, we hope a large and diverse network of individuals will emerge across a range of institutions to drive the debate nationally and internationally."

The science of geoengineering is controversial for many reasons. For one, there is the possibility of creating even more environmental damage and disaster once geoengineering programs are started, including the loss of blue skies and an increase in temperature for some parts of the world. In addition, there are those who believe in the Chemtrails Conspiracy, which states that weather modification programs are actively taking place in our skies. According to this theory, the "normal" contrails created by planes are actually covert geoengineering programs being carried out right above our heads. The "chemtrails" label comes from the portion of the crowd that believes these programs are delivering dangerous chemical additives to the food, water, soil, and humans below for nefarious purposes.

Interestingly, researchers with Carnegie Science at the University of California Irvine and the nonprofit Near Zero recently published a study which claimed to conclusively debunk the possibility of this alleged secret government geoengineering program. The study, "Quantifying expert consensus against the existence of a secret, large-scale atmospheric spraying program", was published in the journal Environmental Research Letters. The authors of the study conducted a survey of the leading contrail and atmosphere scientists to find out if there was sufficient evidence to support claims of a secret, large-scale atmospheric spraying program (SLAP). The contrail and atmospheric experts overwhelmingly rejected evidence cited by believers of what is sometimes known as the "Chemtrails Conspiracy."

Despite the conflicting views and opinions, earlier this month California Congressman Jerry McNerney introduced legislation calling for a hearing in the House Committee on Science, Space & Technology (SST) to collect information from experts in the field of geoengineering. McNerney also introduced H.R. 4586, the Geoengineering Research Evaluation Act, which would "provide for a federal commitment to the creation of a geoengineering research agenda and an assessment of the potential risks of geoengineering practices."

"We've reached a moment of clarity in the fight against climate change where we are experiencing the repercussions of the atmospheric buildup of greenhouse gasses," said Congressman McNerney. "Even if human beings were to cease all greenhouse gas emissions tomorrow, significant atmospheric change has already been set in motion and will continue to occur for generations to come."

The legislation would commission the National Academies of Science (NAS) to produce two reports recommending a geoengineering research strategy and oversight principles for such research. According to the press release, "the bill also provides for the creation of an implementation plan to ensure a path forward for additional geoengineering research and development."

Opponents of geoengineering are not sitting by in silence while the Carnegie Council and politicians advance their goals. A recent report from the ETC Group, Biofuelwatch, and Heinrich Böll Foundation warn that geoengineering is gaining acceptance "as a would-be technological fix for climate change." The report, "The Big Bad Fix -- The Case Against Climate Geoengineering," analyzes the risks of geoengineering, and shows the different individuals and organizations working to advance the technology.

"Geoengineering is a dangerous defence of the failed status quo, not a technical or scientific necessity," says Rachel Smolker, Co-director of Biofuelwatch. "In fact, the technologies put forward for geoengineering will most likely worsen rather than solve the multifaceted problems created by climate change. Claiming that we 'must' deploy geoengineering is saying that we would sooner do irreparable harm to our planet than alter our economic system that benefits only the very few at the top."

Geoengineering: The real climate threat
Published on Feb 13, 2013
The environmental movement has developed a single-minded obsession with the supposed effects of carbon dioxide on the global climate. Rather than CO2 gas, however, the technologies that are now being proposed to mitigate this supposed problem might be the real cause of our coming environmental calamity. This is the GRTV Backgrounder on Global Research TV.

Geoengineering: The real climate change threat
Corbett * 02/14/2013 * 26 Comments
Podcast: Play in new window | Download | Embed
by James Corbett
February 13, 2013

For decades now, we have been told to be afraid of the long-term effects of manmade carbon dioxide on our climate. Seemingly every day some new storm, drought, warm spell or cold snap is featured on the news, with government-funded scientists warning us that this is a sign of things to come unless the world reduces its CO2 production.

The problem, of course, is that this is a third-rate scientific hoax propagated on the strength of the public's ignorance of the underlying science, or lack thereof. The models and predictions used to scare the public into believing that CO2 is driving climate and will continue to do so in an increasingly dangerous fashion share the distinction of being universally wrong in their predictions of trends over the past 15 years, yet we are still asked to believe in the long-term validity of these same falsified models.

As Robinson et. al. noted in their 2007 study, "Environmental Effects of Increased Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide," published by the Oregon Institute of Science and Medicine, "Predictions of harmful climatic effects due to future increases in hydrocarbon use and minor greenhouse gases like CO2 do not conform to current experimental knowledge."

Also in 2007, J. Scott Armstrong, a researcher at the University of Pennsylvania and the author of "Long-Range Forecasting," a standard textbook on the principles of forecasting, co-authored an audit of the procedures that the IPCC used for its global warming projections, finding that those procedures violated 72 of the 89 relevant principles of scientific forecasting.

Last year the Journal of Geophysical Research-Atmospheres published a study showing that climate prediction models examining periods of less than 30 years on the geographical scale of continents are riddled with inaccuracies.

Earlier this year, the UK's Met office was forced to revise downward their projections for temperature increase over the next four years after a 15 year standstill in global annual temperatures. Ironically, this divergence from the continuous temperature increases that had been predicted by the CO2 alarmists is now being blamed on "natural variability" including "the cycles of changes in solar activity," which leaked drafts of the IPCC AR5 report due out next year indicate has been vastly underestimated.

Sadly, the fearmongering, hype and misleading predictions on this issue have become so internalized that there is a subsection of the population that is now willing to question whether every conceivable event in the galaxy is the result of carbon dioxide, even near-earth asteroids.

That so many are concentrating so much time and attention on the question of carbon dioxide, a trace gas in the atmosphere which itself is only partially manmade, is only to be expected. Scientists, pundits, writers and businessmen are only responding to the market incentives that are at play. Governments and universities around the world are now sinking billions of dollars a year into grants to fund research related to the supposed CO2 threat, and entire industries such as carbon trading and carbon sequestration, are developing in response to this interest. Quite simply, too much money and potential political power is at stake for the threat of global warming to be revealed as a false alarm.

One of the most worrying possibilities to arise from this trend, however, is the political legitimization of a concept that, ironically, has the potential to become a real threat to our environment: geoengineering.

The practice of geoengineering is now well over half a century old. As early as the late 1940s, American mathematician John von Neumann was researching weather modification and its potential uses in climatic warfare for the US Department of Defense. In the 1950s early cloudbursting experiments were performed by Wilhelm Reich and in 1956 Dr. Walter Russell was writing of the potential for complete weather control.

In the 1960s, Dr. Bernard Vonnegut, brother of the famous writer, vastly improved the techniques then in use by employing silver iodide crystals in the cloud seeding mixture. Silver iodide's hygroscopic qualities insure water particles quickly bond with its crystalline structure. As the recent documentary Skywatcher points out, the process of cloud seeding is now so widely and routinely employed that it is having profound effects on our climate.

Given that CO2 is not the problem it is made out to be, coupled with the admitted advent of modern weather modification technologies in DoD research programs, it is impossible not to inquire into the possible links between the current push toward geoengineering and the military-industrial complex. Last year I had the chance to talk to Professor Michel Chossudovsky of the Centre for Research on Globalization about the past, present, and future of weather warfare technology.

The potential military benefits to the wartime deployment of weather modification technologies are self-evident. In fact, they are so self-evident that, as Professor Chossudovsky notes, the UN was compelled to introduce a convention in 1977 prohibiting the use of environmental modification technology in warfare. The US ratified that convention in 1980.

Other potential benefits to the deployment of this technology suggest themselves in the monetary sphere. So many events in the course of human activity are predicated on short-term weather and long-term climate phenomena that the ability to determine (or even influence) either could be extremely valuable. Insurance companies, for example, stand to lose billions (and reconstruction-related industries stand to make those same billions) every time a strong storm makes landfall in populated areas.

So it should not be surprising that a market has evolved for "weather derivatives," effectively allowing large financial institutions to make money gambling on the weather. And it should also come as no surprise that this market was largely pioneered by that infamous globalist-connected insider corporation, Enron.

Last year I had the chance to talk to researcher Peter Kirby about Enron's involvement in weather derivatives and the vast sums that stand to be made as geoengineering projects continue to be deployed under the threshold of public awareness.

Even if we were to assume that weather modification technologies are not currently being used for the purposes of weather warfare or market manipulation, the potential for such abuses alone should be more than enough to dissuade us from pursuing these technologies. Even more worrying, perhaps, are the true unknown environmental ramifications of the long-term effects of these technologies on our environment.

Ironically enough, those who are warning us of the potentially disastrous consequences of manmade climate change may be exactly right in their assessment after all. But in the end, it may not be the manmade CO2 they are worried about that is the real culprit of this coming catastrophe, but the geoengineering technologies that are being proposed as the "solution" to this problem.

Filed in: Videos
Tagged with: climate change * environment * geoengineering

If you enjoyed this article, subscribe to receive more just like it.

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed
Sites That Link to this Post

Geoengineering: The Real Climate Threat | Conscious Life News | 02/14/2013
Geoengineering: The real climate threat » The Original N-D-N's Blog | 02/14/2013
Geoengineering: The real climate threat - (video) » A Political Rennie | 02/14/2013
Activist Post: Geoengineering: The Real Climate Threat | USA ZORROZ PRESS -- GOD BLESS THE WORLD | 02/14/2013
Climate Change: Is Geoengineering the Real Threat? | News | 02/14/2013
Geoengineering: The real climate change threat | Thought Crime Radio | 02/14/2013
The Corbett Report | Geoengineering: The real climate change threat | Definition Of Global Warming | 02/14/2013
Our Environmental Catastrophe: Geoengineering and Weather Warfare | T-Room | 02/15/2013
Geoengineering: The real climate threat & Report on Our Simulated Reality | peter's space | 02/15/2013
>> Geoengenharia: a verdadeira ameaça climática (em inglês) | 02/16/2013
Geoengineering and Weather Warfare: The Real Climate Change Threat | | 02/16/2013
Chemtrail Flu: Have You Got It Yet? - Theupliftingcrane's Blog | 02/18/2013
Geoengineering: The real climate threat | MottledThrush | 02/18/2013
Geoengineering: The real climate change threat | Anti Oligarch | 02/18/2013
Geoengineering: The real climate change threat » Philosophers stone | Philosophers stone | 02/18/2013
Read.Listen.Watch.Info - Geoengineering: The real climate threat | 02/19/2013
Geoengineering: The real climate change threat - Conspiracyanalyst's Thoughts and Research | 02/20/2013
Newsletter From the Climate Realists, No. 2 For 2013 | NORTHLAND NEW ZEALAND CHEMTRAILS WATCH | 02/24/2013
Our Coming Environmental Catastrophe: Geoengineering and Weather Warfare | LeakSource | 03/02/2013
La catastrofe ambientale: la geoingegneria e la guerra del meteo | NoGeoingegneria | 03/04/2013
In Motion Broadcast VII -- Geo-Engineering | | 03/04/2013
Geoengischmeering | Children of a Revolution | 03/16/2013
Geoengineering: The real climate threat | Free RealityTV | 03/17/2013

keelhaul says:
03/10/2015 at 7:15 am
eugenics today would most certainly need to be disguised as something so why not climate change. what im wondering is the chemtrail operations as propaganda for global warming. to what extent these people will go is a question i probably dont want to know the answer to but is all this spraying really just to acclimate us to something they may admit and openly do someday, as some kind of evidence in an attempt to provide a solution to a problem that doesnt even exist? in any case, i suppose it would satisfy nicely in the development of an effective dispersal program for the eugenicists come 'culling' day.

'Solar radiation management': Scientists hope to fight climate change with geoengineering
RT America

CIA Whistleblower Speaks Out About Climate Engineering, Vaccination Dangers, and 911
Dane Wigington

We are in Global Cooling!! not warming !!

Physicist William Happer Schooled The CNBC Crowd On Global Warming

Ground-breaking New Report Launched Today The Big Bad Fix -- The Case Against Climate Geoengineering
For Immediate Release
Wednesday, December 6, 2017
Organization Profile:
Contact: Rachel Smolker:, 1-802-482-2848

Nairobi/Berlin - "The Big Bad Fix -- The Case Against Climate Geoengineering," a report released today by ETC Group, Biofuelwatch and Heinrich Böll Foundation, warns that geoengineering (the large-scale manipulation of the climate) is gaining acceptance as a would-be technological fix for climate change in key emitting countries, as these countries refuse to break away from their fossil-fuelled economies. Geoengineering research programs and projects planned by industry and state-funded and private research institutions are proliferating, primarily in high-emitting countries such as the US, the UK and China. "The Big Bad Fix" analyses the context and risks of geoengineering, and reveals the actors, vested interests and political developments underway to advance the large-scale technological schemes to manipulate the Earth's natural systems.
Although considered reckless and unacceptable by many scientific and political experts, geoengineering is now increasingly being pushed into the mainstream of climate policy debates, where it creates the illusion of a technological shortcut to manage the symptoms of climate change without addressing its root causes.

However, as the report details, geoengineering poses many risks for people, ecosystems and security. It relies on excessive land, water and resource consumption, threatens food security, and undermines democratic control over the world's commons because its untested technologies are also developed by patent-holders for profit. Therefore, the report states, irreversible harm to biodiversity and ecosystem integrity is highly probable. There are also serious concerns about geoengineering governance, including the potential for unilateral deployment, the risk of conflict in the event of adverse regional impacts and side effects, and the risk of weaponization of geoengineering technologies.

"Geoengineering is a dangerous defence of the failed status quo, not a technical or scientific necessity. In fact, the technologies put forward for geoengineering will most likely worsen rather than solve the multifaceted problems created by climate change. Claiming that we 'must' deploy geoengineering is saying that we would sooner do irreparable harm to our planet than alter our economic system that benefits only the very few at the top," says Rachel Smolker, Co-director of Biofuelwatch.

The "Big Bad Fix" is being launched today in Nairobi during the 3rd United Nations Environmental Assembly and in the run-up to a meeting of the United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) in Montreal. Geoengineering is subject to a de facto moratorium under the CBD, and marine geoengineering is prohibited by the London Protocol of the London Convention on the Prevention of Marine Pollution. The authors of the report argue that these decisions must be upheld and must be the starting point of any legitimate, international and democratic discussion of geoengineering governance.

"Geoengineering would exacerbate the global power imbalance, creating winners and losers. It would be foolish to allow a group of countries to take control of the global thermostat," states Silvia Ribeiro, Latin America Director of ETC Group. "Governance must not be mistaken to mean establishing regulations to legalize and permit the development of such technologies. Banning exceedingly risky and dangerous technologies is a legitimate and prudent approach to governance, as put in practice with the Nuclear Test Ban Treaty and the UN's adoption of a Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons in July 2017," adds Ribeiro.

Instead of resorting to unproven, risky technofixes, the report calls for the rapid implementation of a climate-just vision for limiting global warming to under 1.5°C.

"Proponents of geoengineering are feeding the illusion that we can escape our climate crises without having to adjust our emission-heavy lifestyles. But reality is not that simple. Not only do geoengineering technologies come with new risks and side effects, they also distract from the only proven solution for climate change: a radical reduction of climate changing emissions. Before geoengineering is put into action, we need clear and binding regulations for these technologies. An international framework of regulation must be grounded in the precautionary principle, and technologies with associated risks that are not predictable, justifiable or manageable must be prohibited outright," says Barbara Unmüßig, Director of the Heinrich Böll Foundation.

The report concludes that the numerous high-impact risks of geoengineering, and the political, social, cultural, economic, ethical, moral, intergenerational and rights-based problems it implies, render geoengineering unacceptable. Further, the authors argue that it is a dangerous distraction from the urgent need to support viable alternatives: making deep emission cuts in the near-term and rapidly transforming our economies to allow for a socially and ecologically sustainable and just future, rather than locking the world into a long-term dependence on non-existent, high-risk technologies.

The Big Bad Fix: The Case Against Climate Geoengineering
Click here to read the report:

biofuelwatch | The Big Bad Fix: The Case Against Climate Geoengineering

Pilots, Doctors & Scientists Tell Truth about Chemtrails [Excerpts] - YouTube

What Chemtrails Are Doing To Your Brain - Neurosurgeon Dr. Russell Blaylock Reveals Shocking Facts. - YouTube

Proof that Chemtrails Are Real - YouTube

The Great Chemtrail Hoax, Nikon P-900 83x Zoom Proves Chemtrails are a Cover Up - YouTube

Insider Reveals Their Plans with Chemtrails - How To Survive

Chemtrails Fully Explained! MUST SEE!!... SHARE THIS INFO!!! - YouTube

Pilots dont want you to see this! Chemtrails! - YouTube

I Spray My Chemtrails At Night! - YouTube

"Chemtrails" -- How They Affect You and What You Can Do - YouTube

What are CHEMTRAILS? Proving they EXIST by "CAPTAIN" Joe - YouTube

Contrails or Chemtrails? here's the answer. - YouTube

Chemtrails: Hazard or Healthy? - YouTube

Chemtrails? Watch This! Then Try to Deny It - YouTube

Chemtrails Killing Americans Exposed By Dr. Blaylock - YouTube



Chemtrails: Experimenting on the Public - YouTube
Chemtrails Exposed - The Past, Present and Future of the New Manhattan Project
Published on Jul 5, 2016

DARPA Exposed

India Kicks Out Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation - #NewWorldNextWeek
Welcome to New World Next Week - the video series from Corbett Report and Media Monarchy that covers some of the most important developments in open source intelligence news.
This week: Story #1:
92% Of Berlin Left-Wing Activists Live With Their Parents
"92 Per Cent Of The Radically Left-Wing Ones Still Live With Mummy"
"If You Are Not a Liberal at 25, You Have No Heart. If You Are Not a Conservative at 35 You Have No Brain"
Is the Agenda a New Civil War? Police Paid Informants £19.5M In Five Years
Story #2: Firm That Helped Feds Crack iPhone Gets Hacked, Tools Leaked Online
#MorningMonarchy: Israeli Phone Hacking Firm Cellebrite Confirms "Information Security Breach" (Jan. 17, 2017 -- Coverage @ 23:58)
Derrick Broze Explains Jeff Sessions' War on Encryption
Ohio Man's Pacemaker Data Betrays Him In Arson, Insurance Fraud Case
#MorningMonarchy: The Pacemaker Panopticon
Story #3: Gates Foundation Mission Shut Down In India For Big Pharma Ties
Beware Americans Bearing Gifts: NGOs as Trojan Horses

Bill Gates is EVIL - The Truth about Bill Gates Foundation Depopulation Agenda

"Chemtrails" -- How They Affect You and What You Can Do
THRIVE Movement

Pilots, Doctors and Scientists Tell the Truth About Chemtrails

Peter Kirby is the author of the new book Chemtrails Exposed: A New Manhattan Project. Today we tackle the two questions most frequently asked by chemtrail skeptics: would the government do something like this and could they do something like this. We also talk about John Brennan's recent call for stratospheric aerosol injection and a 2016 study on the health effects of stratospheric aerosols.

Our Coming Environmental Catastrophe: Geoengineering and Weather Warfare

Rain Tests Again Confirm 4 Geoengineering Related Metals: Skies are being Sprayed

Geoengineering Whistleblower -- Ex-Military -- Kristen Meghan, Hauppauge, NY, January 18th, 2014 - YouTube

Geoengineering science: Aerosols impact cloud formation and weather; atmospheric scientists document the effects

Is It Fickle Mother Nature Or Determined Weather Geoengineering: Nor'easter No. 4 And Rainwater Analysis

geoengineering -- Forbidden Knowledge TV

Covert Stratospheric Aerosol Geoengineering -- Forbidden Knowledge TV


Subliminal Advertising for Martial Law - #NewWorldNextWeek

The IPCC Exposed
Published on Sep 27, 2013
The IPCC has released its latest assessment of the state of climate science, and this time it's even more dire than their 2007 assessment. Global warming is "unequivocal" and humans are the "dominant cause" to a certainty of 95%. But how are these uncertainties calculated? And how does the IPCC process work anyway? Join us this week on The Corbett Report as we dissect the latest IPCC hype and examine the organizations processes and conclusions.

How the Global Warming Scare Began

Lord Monckton Rips Into A Young Alarmist

Warmists Stunned by Roger Pielke in Senate Testimony on Climate Change

IPCC's Ben Santer admits GW hoax

The CO2 Scam - Senator Malcolm Roberts Nov 8th 2016

Climate Change in 12 Minutes - The Skeptic's Case
Stefan Molyneux

25 NASA Scientists Question 'Man-Made Global Warming'

Tim Ball - The Deliberate Corruption of Climate Science

The CIA Director Just Cheerfully Chatted up the CFR About Chemtrails
Truthstream Media

"Climate Change" Hoax Starting to Crumble as Scientists Admit Doom Projections Were Totally Wrong
RiseEarth 1:13 PM depopulation , World Truth
by Vicki Batts; Natural News

Climate change has been presented as an irrefutable fact; a happening that cannot be ignored, with even the slightest change in weather being named a harbinger of imminent disaster. But the truth is that the notion of global warming has always been up for debate -- and new science continues to show that the world may not be ending, after all.

Despite what the climate change alarmists want you to believe, recent research has shown that climate change predictions have been wildly overstated. In fact, climatologists now say that the impact of human activity on climate is 45 percent less severe than expected.

The research was carried out by U.S.-based climatologist Judith Curry and mathematician Nick Lewis, who hails from the United Kingdom. The duo analyzed climate data from the mid-19th century, all the way up through the year 2016, measuring the effects of greenhouse gasses and other purported drivers of climate change along the way.

Climate models found to be wildly inaccurate

What they found was shocking: Simulations carried out by the United Nations' Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change were way off. According to Curry and Lewis, these predictions overestimate the future impact of "climate change" by between 30 and 45 percent.

"Our results imply that, for any future emissions scenario, future warming is likely to be substantially lower than the central computer model-simulated level projected by the IPCC, and highly unlikely to exceed that level," Lewis commented.

Lewis and Curry's predictions estimate a temperature rise of no more than 1.66C; the U.N.'s estimate is nearly double that at 3.1C. More, reports indicate that these predictions laid out by the U.N. aren't even consistent with the weather in real life.

For many Natural News readers, the idea that climate change propagandists are wrong is nothing new; the founder and director of CWC Labs, ( Mike Adams, revealed in 2017 that so-called climate scientists had actually been faking their data. As Adams reported, a review of global warming data ( showed that "scientists" had been altering the recorded surface temperatures to show warming when there was, in fact, none to report.

And it's not just temperature data that's been tampered with: Other reports have shown that tidal gauge data has also been wrongfully "adjusted" to fit the climate change narrative.

The Health Ranger has reported on scientific fraud ( regarding climate change many times, noting that carbon dioxide is not only essential for life on this planet -- but that CO2 levels on Earth have been many, many times higher than they are now in the past, and life has still managed to thrive.

As Adams contends:

The problem with the global warming narrative, of course, is that it contradicted the scientific evidence which clearly showed the Earth wasn't warming as had been frighteningly predicted by apocalyptic global warming alarmists. So they changed the narrative to "climate change," which is now recognized as one of the most stupid-headed science fails of all time, given that Earth's climate has always demonstrated rapid change, long before modern humans arrived on the scene. Perhaps that's why over 31,000 scientists now say global warming is a complete hoax.

All real evidence points towards one thing: Global warming, as we've come to know it, seems to be a complete and total sham. Not only have proponents of so-called climate change been caught red-handed manipulating (or flat-out changing) data to fit their agenda -- the true data show that the apocalyptic-sized predictions propagated by climate alarmists ( aren't even based on reality.

Global Warming Temperature Data Exposed as Systematic Science FRAUD



GMO Food -- It's Worse Than We Thought - Dr. Russell Blaylock
Russell Blaylock M.D
Published on Dec 23, 2013
GMO Food -- It's Worse Than We Thought

Over the last decade, as genetically modified, or GMO, foods have increasingly taken over our food supply, we've been learning more about their dangers to our health.

Now, one courageous doctor is pointing to mounting evidence that leaves no doubt -- GMO foods are even worse than we were told.

As this respected doctor points out in a riveting new presentation, no long-term human studies have ever supported GMO safety. Shockingly, the World Health Organization only requires a mere 90 days of testing to claim that GMOs are safe. Well, no one dies from smoking cigarettes within 90 days of starting to smoke, either!

Yet while lifetime studies still have not been done on humans, scientists have done these studies on animals -- and what they found is stunning. Lab mice fed just a 33 percent GMO diet begin developing aggressive cancers (particularly breast cancer), liver failure, and kidney failure.

Shockingly, 50 percent of the males and 70 percent of the female animals on the GMO diet succumbed to early death at an age equivalent to 40 to 50 human years.

While more people have begun to fight back against GMOs, the big GMO companies spend millions of dollars to defeat laws that would require GMO labeling. Quite simply, these big companies know that GMO crops are cheaper to grow, and therefore more profitable.

In the meantime, many health experts now warn us to take the only positive action available to protect our health -- avoiding GMOs as much as humanly possible. But considering the fact that GMOs are hidden in over 30,000 food products, that is not an easy task.

Fortunately, one courageous doctor has stepped up to the plate. Dr. Russell Blaylock, one of America's leading medical researchers and nutritionists, has created a special free video presentation that explains the hidden health hazards of GMOs. Dr. Blaylock will show you how to protect your family from GMOs and their dangers -- aisle by aisle at the grocery store.

Dr. Blaylock's new video presentation exposes how GMO ingredients and other harmful additives are hidden on labels under safe-sounding names. In fact, you'll see some of the actual labels and find out what to watch for.

And those stickers pasted onto fruits and vegetables? Using real examples, you'll learn a simple way to tell the difference between GMO produce that may also be packed with harmful pesticides and herbicides, and produce that is safe and natural.

Cracking the GMO Code

Travis Davis, health publisher at Newsmax, previewed Dr. Blaylock's presentation for our readers and reports: "GMOs enter your body through thousands of packaged and canned food products, through fresh produce, and through the meat, chicken, and fish you eat. The expert help Dr. Blaylock offers in this video reveals everything you need to know to avoid GMOs at the grocery store as well as restaurants."

Since the introduction of GMO foods, many cancers and other diseases have skyrocketed in humans. Can this really be a coincidence? Please use the information available in this online educational presentation, Cracking the GMO Code to help protect your own health -- and the health of your family.

Renowned former neurosurgeon Russell Blaylock, M.D., left conventional medicine after decades of practice to concentrate on nutrition and disease prevention. He is the author of several health books and medical editor of The Blaylock Wellness Report.

Editor's Note: This video blows the lid off the GMO controversy and exposes little-known dangers. Plus, you'll see exactly how to avoid GMOs in their many hidden forms, in grocery stores and in restaurants.
© 2013 NewsmaxHealth. All rights reserved.

Please click this link if you would like to claim the 'cracking the GMO code' package:

Cell Phones, WiFi, 5G, Surveillance

City of Berkeley Passes Ordinance Taking on Surveillance State

Hey! Yo! Ohio, Your Elected Officials Passed A Bill So Telecom Companies May Now Install More Small Cell Towers in Residential Yards and Everywhere Else. (syn: 5G; cellphones; wifi; )
TOPICS:5G BN Frank Ohio
April 18, 2018
By B.N. Frank

Dear Ohioans, last week, comedian, Bill Maher made a crack about cell phones.

You are tolerating things right now that will make you cringe in 25 years.

We can't believe people in old movies smoked. They won't believe we put the cellphone in our pocket next to our nuts.

Have you ever asked yourself "If cell phone and wireless WiFi radiation exposure is no big deal, why do manuals for cell Phones, iPads, wi-Fi routers, etc. include guidelines and warnings?"

And are you aware that no "safe" level of cell phone or wireless (WiFi) radiation has yet to be scientifically determined for children or pregnant women?

There is research that confirms that exposure to cell phone and wireless WiFi radiation along with Electromagnetic Fields has a cumulative toxic effect when combined with other toxins. It's no secret that Ohio has identified many environmental toxins within the state already.

Regardless, on Wednesday, April 11, 2018, The Ohio Senate Committee of Public Utilities passed HB 478, The Small Cells Expansion Bill.

HB 478 was introduced on January 23, 2018 because 90+ Ohio municipal governments filed lawsuits against the small cell tower clause added at the last minute to Ohio SB 331, "The Petland Bill." The "wireless" clause eliminated the ability for municipal governments to stop telecom companies from installing small cell towers and infrastructure pretty much wherever they wanted including in front of homes, public rights-of-ways, historical districts, etc.

On February 9, 2018 Dr. Oz featured a segment on his show called "The Rise of 5G Cell Towers" about small cell tower concerns. Consumer organizations, doctors, elected officials, environmentalists, scientists, and residents in other states are fighting and have stopped similar bills. There are similar federal bills also being fought.

Firefighters have fought cell towers being installed on station property for many years already due to health concerns. In California, firefighters fought for an ordinance that exempts them from being installed on station property.

Even before the Ohio bill was passed last week, many small cell towers had already been installed throughout Ohio and in front of homes. Many residents aren't aware that they are cell towers. Some may be 4G while some are 5G. Regardless, all cell towers emit harmful cell phone and wireless WiFi radiation. In 2014, The Wall Street Journal published an article about how 1 in 10 cell towers already violated current RF safety standards.

On September 13, 2017, 180 scientists and doctors demanded a moratorium on the installation of 5G small cell tower infrastructure because of health concerns:

We, the undersigned, more than 180 scientists and doctors from 35 nations, recommend a moratorium on the roll-out of the fifth generation, 5G, for telecommunication until potential hazards for human health and the environment have been fully investigated by scientists independent from industry.

Scientists and Doctors Demand Moratorium on 5G Warning of Health Effects
Increased radiation from cell towers poses potential risks, say scientists from around the world.

There is solid research confirming that there is more potential harm from 5G millimeter microwaves than 4G wireless. It ain't pretty:

The human body has between two million to four million sweat ducts. Dr. Ben-Ishai of Hebrew University, Israel explains that our sweat ducts act like "an array of helical antennas when exposed to these wavelengths," meaning that we become more conductive.

Sweat ducts acting like helical antennas = MORE SWEATING. 5G may also increase your metabolism which may sound ideal for some people. Regardless, research has already proven that all sources of wireless WiFi radiation and electrical pollution (Electrosmog) can harm pets, nature, and wildlife too.

The Nation recently published an article about cell phone safety and 5G technology. They refer to the Telecom Industry now as "Big Wireless" and are comparing them to "Big Tobacco" and "Big Oil."

Research also shows that cell phone and WiFi radiation disrupt the blood-brain barrier which can cause it to leak. This may cause behavioral, emotional, mental, and physical health including acne, impotence, "Rapid Aging Syndrome," flu-like symptoms, and reduced impulse control.

Research has also proven that exposure to cell phone and wireless (WiFi) radiation can worsen pre-existing conditions -- even if it didn't cause them.

Oh yeah -- let's not forget about cancer. That's not a problem in Ohio, is it?

In 2011 Ohio's then-congressman, Dennis Kucinich, expressed his concerns regarding health issues caused by exposure to cell phones, cell towers, and wireless and digital utility "Smart" meters. Many Ohio residents also have utility "smart" meters installed on their homes and throughout their communities. These types of meters have been a source of health issues as well as fires, explosions, measurement errors, privacy violations, and more. They also aren't eco-friendly as promised by utility companies.

Also timely -- any Ohio communities that are considering becoming "Smart Cities" are basically agreeing to allow small cell tower infrastructure to be installed everywhere. Some of these towers may be hidden inside other objects like pretty light posts and church steeples.

"Smart Cities" may sound trendy and cool. They are also being marketed as great for the economy. But it may now be more obvious to you that there will be biological and environmental health consequences as well from having wireless infrastructure installed everywhere. Even driverless cars are actually scary in ways other than just causing accidents.

Cell tower infrastructure has proven to reduce property value-- even when hidden in pretty light posts. People don't want to live near cell towers -- even if they aren't 100% convinced they can't be harmed by them.

There have also been many privacy concerns and issues identified with "Smart Cities."

Countless Ohio residents contacted their elected officials before HB 478 was passed and voiced their concerns. Some of them had already become sick from sources of cell phone and wireless WiFi radiation as well as Electrosmog.

All of this information and much more was provided to the Ohio Senate Committee of Public Utilities before they voted on HB478.


Senator Beagle submitted the following report:

The standing committee on Public Utilities, to which was referred Sub. H.B. No. 478-Representatives Smith, R., LaTourette, et al., having had the same under consideration, reports back a substitute bill and recommends its passage.

Co-Sponsor: Beagle.

YES -- 11:

NO -- 2:

Any Ohioans who are upset with the passing of this bill are encouraged to contact their elected officials -- especially the Senate Committee for Public Utilities. Need their phone numbers? Click this link and you'll find them at the end of the article.

Just How Free Are You Really?
Ileana Johnson -- November 12, 2017

What happens if you live off-grid?

If you live independent of utilities, water, and sewer, and provide your own energy through solar panels, have your own sewer system, and use rainwater, you may run into problems with your local government. Robin Speroni of Cape Coral, Florida, was sued by local officials that her off-grid home was illegal, citing the International Property Maintenance Code. She was found guilty of not being hooked to the water supply.

"Speroni is still being hassled by the municipality of Cape Coral for not having a connection to city water or property sewage. This is in spite of the fact that the city capped her sewers themselves."

What happens if you don't send your kids to public school?

It is certainly against the law not to send your children to school and charges vary from state to state. You may lose public assistance such as food stamps. According to the U.S. Department of Education, in some states, you may have to go to jail. If you home-school, you have to follow laws specifically designed for home-schoolers.

What happens if you want to worship in a church that is not sanctioned as a church but deemed a cult?

To answer this question you must study both sides of what happened to the people at Ruby Ridge and Waco. Here is a link to the liberal version of the fiery events that resulted in the deaths of many people, especially innocent children.

What happens if you don't have a driver's license?

Driving without a license is considered a crime in all 50 states. You have a right to travel but you cannot operate a vehicle without a license. If you are an illegal alien, the law is much laxer, as the lawbreaker will get a slap on the wrist and will be released back into the streets to repeat his/her behavior.

What happens if you jaywalk?

Jaywalking is an infraction that requires in some states a fine but a misdemeanor with a court appearance in other states. Penalties vary by state and by municipalities. Fines range from $1 to $1,000.

What happens if you refuse to have your child vaccinated?

In most states, vaccines are required for your child to enter daycare, schools, and universities. Laws vary from state to state.

What happens if you refuse to be molested by the TSA in an airport?

It is obvious that you cannot fly and you will be promptly escorted out of the airport by TSA agents. If you are belligerent and vocal in your refusal, you will be arrested in most states.

What happens if you disagree politically with a group?

You will be shunned, may lose your job, you will become a pariah, you will be tracked and possibly beaten by the opposition, your home and property, including your car, will be vandalized, and you will be forbidden from expressing your divergent opinion on an American campus. Those opposing you will resort to violence and fascistic means in order to prevent you from being on their campus to express your opinion guaranteed by our Constitution because your opinion hurts the feelings of campus snowflakes and they will label your views as "hate speech," in essence cutting off your freedom of speech.

What happens if you go to college and dare to express your conservative or divergent opinions from those of the teachers and the majority of snowflakes?

Your teachers will prevent you from speaking in class, you will be ridiculed, marginalized, and possibly given a lower grade in class than you actually earned. You will be relegated to a designated corner on campus where you might be able to express your opinion without being physically assaulted and verbally insulted.

What happens if you protect your property and shoot an intruder?

It depends on the state. The intruders have been known to hire eager attorneys who successfully prosecuted those protecting their homes, resulting in the loss of their homes and land which is awarded to the intruder and his family and even jail time for those who engaged in self-defense.

What happens if illegal aliens try to steal from you and you shoot them?

The most recent case in Kansas City, Missouri, involves David Jungerman, a business owner who shot a home intruder in the leg. A 39-year old attorney, Tom Pickert, who represented the home invader and won millions of dollars in a civil lawsuit against Jungerman, was shot and killed in his front yard.

What happens if you express your opinion that illegal immigration is illegal and should be stopped by building a wall?

At best you are considered a conspiracy theorist nut-job and heartless who does not understand that America was built by such illegal immigrants; at worst you are a xenophobe and racist. Irrational globalists will hide the fact that America was built by LEGAL immigrants who were vetted for their health in quarantine at Ellis Island and, who did not come to America for the welfare system because the welfare system did not exist at the time.

What happens if you criticize the theocracy of Islam, Sharia Law, and genital mutilation?

You will be publicly humiliated, accused of Islamophobia, and marginalized, your home and property vandalized, threatened with lawsuits, become a potential victim of a fatwa, and possibly fired from your job.

What happens if you try to home-school your children in certain states?

You must jump through incredible hoops in order to be allowed to home-school your child.

What happens if you object to your children being subjected to the Islamic curriculum indoctrination of Common Core?

You are ignored, you are banned from any school property or meetings, you are told that it is required by the Common Core Curricula, and security will be called to prevent you from entering the school building. You will not be allowed to attend or speak at public school board meetings. The principal and the teacher(s) in question will not answer your calls or letters.

What happens if you object, as a parent, to the teaching of your children in kindergarten and elementary schools about sexual perversions?

Your opinions and wishes will be overridden by the school, the principal, and the teacher. The curriculum will be taught as planned with or without your knowledge.

What happens if you object to mentally-ill grown men or boys, pretending they are women, use the restrooms and lockers that your little girls use?

You will be labeled a homophobe who does not respect their freedom of expressing who they are inside their heads. The fact that your child is in danger of molestation and rape does not matter. They have rights that supersede your rights or your children's rights.

What happens if you object to the Common Core curricula and do not wish that your Christian children be indoctrinated into the Five Pillars of Islam?

Your child will still be made to wear hijab in order to feel what a Muslim feels like and they will attend a mosque despite your protests. They will be made to recite by heart the Five Pillars of Islam, and to pray in the mosque, thus indoctrinating them into Islam.

What happens if you refuse to bake a cake for a homosexual couple because of your religious beliefs?

You will pay huge fines, lose your business, your savings, and possibly serve time in jail for protecting your religious beliefs.

What happens if you refuse to pay taxes?

You will pay confiscatory fines, have property seized, and possibly go to jail.

What happens if you protest the takeover of your property via eminent domain or the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) shows up with agents to confiscate your land that has been in your family for generations?

You will lose your land and home. Cliven Bundy protected his ranch and grazing rights. Following a 21-year legal dispute between the U.S. Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and Cliven Bundy, for allegedly "failing to pay over $1 million in withheld grazing fees for Bundy's use of federally owned land adjacent to Bundy's ranch in southeastern Nevada," an armed confrontation between supporters of the cattle rancher and law enforcement ensued in 2014.

What happens if you try to collect rainwater or snowmelt on your property?

Gary Harrington from Oregon served 30-days in jail for nine misdemeanors and paid a fine of $1,500 for diverting snow runoff and rainwater into three reservoirs on his property, thus violating "an antiquated law governing personal water use."

What happens if you don't pay HOA fees?

HOA will take you to court and eventually may foreclose on your home and sell it in order to pay overdue fees, depending on the state in which you reside. HOAs retain attorneys for such offenders.

What happens if you try to fly the American flag and Muslim or hard-core liberal neighbors who hate America object?

You will be ordered to take it down, fined, and possibly told to move if you are renting the property. Crosses have been removed from churches and monuments in order to appease Muslims and atheists. Statues have been torn down to appease the racist BLM who were offended by the alleged racist intent of the monument. Large crosses that have been part of a landscape for decades, honoring the fallen or our Christianity, have been ordered removed by the courts in order to satisfy atheists.

What happens if your favorite NFL team players kneel during the National Anthem for the alleged "social injustices" and "deliberate police racism" against blacks, while insulting the veterans present?

The middle class white men will stop buying tickets and attending NFL games, buying jerseys and other football memorabilia, giving the owners and the overpaid players a clear message that their faux political antics do not have a place on a stadium where they are paid to entertain the public with a game, not give the public their two cents of misinformed opinions. Americans still have the power of the purse. You have the freedom to protest in a very public venue but expect consequences of your insulting behavior.

What happens when Hollywood bash conservatives? What happens when slutty starlets pretend to be paragons of virtue, lecturing the rest of us, and claim to be the ultimate source of knowledge because they played a role in a movie?

Americans still have the power to stop buying tickets to their movies and concerts. Boycotts work quite nicely as many actors learned this summer when their movies tanked at the box office. You may fancy yourselves political gurus and know-it-all, but, at the end of the day, you are just script memorizers who act in a movie. You dropped out of high school because you did not have academic ability; you had talent to act in a movie and to impersonate a certain character.

What happens when academia and public schools turn your children into hard-core socialists/fascists who hate their country while you think they are getting an education?

The results are evident in the millennial generation joining ANTIFA, an organization run by communist anarchists who employ fascistic violence to protest those whose divergent opinions they want to squash yet they call them fascists and their organization anti-fascism when in reality they are the violent fascists.

The results are also evident in the brainwashing of several lost generations of American voters who believe that the communist Democrats are the "real" Americans, U.S. should be socialist/communist, and everything that made this country the success that is today must be destroyed. They spit, defecate on, and burn the American flag, demand the abolition of the National Anthem, of the Star-Spangled Banner, the replacing of the Constitution with their own Marxist version, and the Bill of Rights with the Socialist Bill of Rights.

What happens if you try to plant a bush or cut down a tree next to a rain puddle and environmental NGOs show up with paperwork telling you that you are not allowed to do so?

Martha Boneta can tell you volumes about her farm and the NGO's interdictions that plagued her ownership rights in the rolling, gentrified hills of northern Virginia.

Obama has promised that, if Obamacare was passed, you can keep your doctor and the insurance premiums would go down.

How many of you were actually able to keep your doctors and how many were unable to see doctors and specialists because they no longer accept Medicare patients due to low and slow reimbursement rates? Why would that be? Because the Obama administration robbed billions from Medicare in order to fund his socialized medicine jewel, Obamacare. And millions of Americans who previously had other forms of affordable medical insurance now cannot afford the high premiums and deductibles driven by Obamacare's regulations. In essence, Obamacare insurance and regulations have destroyed middle-class Americans' formerly stellar medical care and sky-rocketed their previously affordable insurance premiums.

As an American, can you cross the border without a passport?

International banks and the Federal Reserve which is neither federal nor a reserve control your money supply, interest rates, and gold reserves.

And there are many other freedoms that you think you still have but they are highly restricted or no longer exist except in theory.

Do you still think you are free?